Mapping Knowledge Structure and Research Frontiers of Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening: A Scientometric Study

Abstract

Background: Among the effective approaches developed for blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening, ultrasound is recognized as a non-invasive technique that can induce localized BBB opening transiently and repeatedly. This technique has aroused broad attention from researchers worldwide, and numerous articles have been published recently. However, no existing study has systematically examined this field from a scientometric perspective. The aim of this study was to summarize the knowledge structure and identify emerging trends and potential hotspots in this field.Methods: Publications related to ultrasound-induced BBB opening published from 1998 to 2020 were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection. The search strategies were as follows: topic: (“blood brain barrier” OR “BBB”) AND topic: (ultrasound OR ultrason* OR acoustic* OR sonopora*). The document type was set to articles or reviews with language restriction to English. Three different analysis tools including one online platform, VOS viewer1.6.16, and CiteSpace V5.7.R2 software were used to conduct this scientometric study.Results: A total of 1,201 valid records were included in the final analysis. The majority of scientific publication was produced by authors from North America, Eastern Asia, and Western Europe. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology was the most prominent journal. The USA, China, and Canada were the most productive countries. Hynynen K, and Mcdannold N were key researchers with considerable academic influence. According to analysis of keywords, four main research directions were identified: cluster 1 (microbubbles study), cluster 2 (management of intracranial tumors), cluster 3 (ultrasound parameters and mechanisms study), and cluster 4 (treatment of neurodegenerative diseases). The current research hotspot has shifted from the basic research of ultrasound and microbubbles to management of intracranial tumors and neurodegenerative diseases. Burst detection analysis showed that Parkinson's disease, doxorubicin, gold nanoparticle, glioblastoma, gene therapy, and Alzheimer's disease may continue to be the research frontiers.Conclusion: Ultrasound-induced BBB opening research is in a period of robust development. This study is a starting point, providing a comprehensive overview, development landscape, and future opportunities of this technology, which standout as a useful reference for researchers and decision makers interested in this area.

The Global Research of Artificial Intelligence on Prostate Cancer: A 22-Year Bibliometric Analysis

“…The larger the value is, the better the clustering result of the network. Another indicator was the silhouette value, which was used to measure the network homogeneity ( 47 , 48 ). As shown in Figure 5B , the modular Q value was 0.7218, and the mean silhouette S value was also as high as 0.9248, indicating that the clustering effect and network homogeneity were satisfactory.…”

A bibliometric analysis of clinical research on fracture-related infection

“…For the United Kingdom (UK), publications from England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales were merged [ 23 ]. Finally, 89 countries contributed to the FRI publications ( Figure 3 ).…”

Knowledge structure and emerging trends on osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a bibliometric and visualized study

“…The results of correlation analysis indicated that part of the discrepancy in the quantity of publications across different countries can be explained by factors of economy or population. The H-index is a bibliometric indicator that simultaneously measures the quality (mainly depends on citations) and quantity (number of documents) of publications in a journal, author, or country [ 19 , 26 ]. In this study, the USA, China, and Japan were the top three countries with the highest H-index.…”

“…Nevertheless, inter-institutional cooperation levels were relatively low and primarily conducted in Asian research institutions. Furthermore, none of the institutions had BC value greater than 0.1, indicating that there was no one institution occupied the absolutely central position in the collaboration network [ 17 , 19 ]. In view of this, strengthening cooperative networks in different research institutions or teams will be important for future studies whether for basic scientific researches or clinical trials.…”

“…Overall, all these visualization maps are also comprised of nodes and lines representing different meanings. Betweenness centrality (BC) is an important indicator that could identify the relative importance of a node within the networks, and nodes with the highest BC value (≥ 0.1) are usually known as hubs nodes that usually marked with purple rings [ 17 , 19 ]. More detailed software utilization skills and information about the visualization maps can be found in the CiteSpace manual (available at http://cluster.ischool.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/CiteSpaceManual.pdf ).…”