2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9030241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Forest Ecosystem Biomass Density for Xiangjiang River Basin by Combining Plot and Remote Sensing Data and Comparing Spatial Extrapolation Methods

Abstract: Abstract:The distribution of forest biomass in a river basin usually has obvious spatial heterogeneity in relation to the locations of the upper and lower reaches of the basin. In the subtropical region of China, a large amount of forest biomass, comprising diverse forest types, plays an important role in maintaining the balance of the regional carbon cycle. However, accurately estimating forest ecosystem aboveground biomass density (AGB) and mapping its spatial variability at a scale of river basin remains a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Kangbao County, there were only 134 sample plots available, and thus a leave-one-out cross validation was utilized for the accuracy assessment and comparison of the methods. The measures used to quantify the accuracy of the predictions included coefficient of determination (R 2 ), mean PVC predictions (MPVC), relative bias (RBias), RMSE and relative RMSE (RRMSE) for the test plots, and coefficient of variation (CV r ), mean value (μ map ), and variance of the prediction maps (VAR map ) [34,58]. Because the field observations of PVC for the plots were obtained by averaging the values of five 1 m × 1 m subplots within each of the 30 m × 30 m plots, the field observations contained uncertainties and were thus regarded as referenced values.…”
Section: Evaluation and Comparison Of Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Kangbao County, there were only 134 sample plots available, and thus a leave-one-out cross validation was utilized for the accuracy assessment and comparison of the methods. The measures used to quantify the accuracy of the predictions included coefficient of determination (R 2 ), mean PVC predictions (MPVC), relative bias (RBias), RMSE and relative RMSE (RRMSE) for the test plots, and coefficient of variation (CV r ), mean value (μ map ), and variance of the prediction maps (VAR map ) [34,58]. Because the field observations of PVC for the plots were obtained by averaging the values of five 1 m × 1 m subplots within each of the 30 m × 30 m plots, the field observations contained uncertainties and were thus regarded as referenced values.…”
Section: Evaluation and Comparison Of Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the parametric methods model a global trend of spatial variability of variables and ignore their local variability. Thus, the methods often lead to overestimations and underestimations for the small and large values of a dependent variable, respectively [33,34]. GWR is also a parametric method but Remote Sens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Stepwise regression screening variables method, one of the most widely used methods in regression models [67,68], was used to establish a remote sensing information model of AGC in bamboo forests. 70% of the sample plots were randomly selected for developing the model, and the others for evaluating the established model.…”
Section: Methods Of Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%