1986
DOI: 10.1016/0143-6228(86)90016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping erosion in Zimbabwe: a methodology for rapid survey using aerial photographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Landsat 8 demonstrated moderately poor quality (i.e. poor radiometric, spatial, spectral characteristics), particularly for detecting spatial occurrence of soil erosion, it holds a good record, especially large-scale mapping, as it is acknowledged by researcher on similar studies (Millington and Townshend, 1984;Whitlow, 1986;Vrieling, 2006;Zhou et al, 2008;Taruvinga, 2009;Seutloali et al, 2017;Dube et al, 2017). Based on the digital classification of Landsat thematic mapper and JERS-1 data, the study by Metternicht and Zinck (1998) detected and mapped different soil erosion feature in Bolivia and concluded that the synergy of Landsat TM provides a unique combination that allows more accurate identification of eroded areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Landsat 8 demonstrated moderately poor quality (i.e. poor radiometric, spatial, spectral characteristics), particularly for detecting spatial occurrence of soil erosion, it holds a good record, especially large-scale mapping, as it is acknowledged by researcher on similar studies (Millington and Townshend, 1984;Whitlow, 1986;Vrieling, 2006;Zhou et al, 2008;Taruvinga, 2009;Seutloali et al, 2017;Dube et al, 2017). Based on the digital classification of Landsat thematic mapper and JERS-1 data, the study by Metternicht and Zinck (1998) detected and mapped different soil erosion feature in Bolivia and concluded that the synergy of Landsat TM provides a unique combination that allows more accurate identification of eroded areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From supervised Landsat image classification, we were able to map 14 cover types in the MGR, which necessitated the use of techniques capable of yielding a comparable number of information classes from CORONA photographs. Initially guided by a preliminary exploration of what is available in the literature (Watson 1995, Whitlow 1986, Rossouw 1997, Garland and Broderick 1992, vector onscreen digitization in Erdas Imagine was tried first. Apart from being time consuming, this procedure yielded outputs that could not be meaningfully compared with their counterparts from Landsat imagery mainly because of difficulties in digitizing fragmented cover types below the minimum mappable threshold.…”
Section: Reference Area and Rationale For Improvisation Of Proposed Tmentioning
confidence: 99%