Mapping and modeling three dimensional lead contamination in the wetland sediments of a former trap-shooting range

Perroy, Ryan L.; Belby, Colin S.; Mertens, Cody J.

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.102

Cited by 31 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As demonstrated in recent work completed by Perroy et al . () and Weindorf et al . (), portable ED‐XRF is a promising tool for use in urban agriculture/geochemistry investigations.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Our future goal is to advance the use of portable ED-XRF in measuring concentrations of heavy metals in urban soil in situ. As demonstrated in recent work completed byPerroy et al (2014) andWeindorf et al (2012), portable ED-XRF is a promising tool for use in urban agriculture/geochemistry Relative difference between NIST data and ICP-MS measurements (from WSLH). Positive values indicate NIST values > WSLH measurements.…”

mentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Forty‐Nine Major and Trace Element Concentrations Measured in Soil Reference Materials NIST SRM 2586, 2587, 2709a, 2710a and 2711a Using ICP‐MS and Wavelength Dispersive‐XRF

Byers

McHenry

Grundl

2016

Geostandard Geoanalytic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Excellent agreement was noted in the concentration of major and trace elements in five NIST (National Institute for Science and Technology) soil reference materials (NIST SRM 2586, 2587, 2709a, 2710a and 2711a between measurement results from wavelength dispersive-XRF and ICP-MS from two independent laboratories, and NIST certificate of analysis and literature data. We describe the variability in concentrations of up to forty-nine elements (plus loss on ignition) and provide values for up to twentyone elements previously uncharacterised by NIST in these soil RMs. The additional characterisation provided in this investigation can be utilised to reduce the measurement bias of custom calibration routines and improve the quality of control checks developed using these NIST RMs.Keywords: National Institute for Science and Technology, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence, WD-XRF, calibration materials, soil, urban agriculture. Un accord excellent a et e not e pour la concentration des el ements majeurs et en trace dans cinq mat eriaux de r ef erence de NIST (Institut national de la science et de la technologie; NIST SRM 2586, 2587, 2709a, 2710a et 2711a) entre les r esultats de mesure de WD-XRF et ICP-MS de deux laboratoires ind ependants, et les certificats d'analyse NIST et des articles scientifiques publi es. Nous d ecrivons la variabilit e des concentrations allant jusqu' a quarante-neuf el ements (plus la perte au feu). En outre, nous fournissons des valeurs pour un maximum de vingt et un des el ements pr ec edemment caract eris es par le NIST dans ces mat eriaux de r ef erence du sol. La caract erisation suppl ementaire fournie dans cette enquête peutêtre utilis e pour r eduire le biais de mesure des routines d' etalonnage personnalis es et d'am eliorer la qualit e des contrôles d evelopp es en utilisant ces mat eriaux de r ef erence. Mots-clés : Institut national de la science et de la technologie, spectrom etrie de masse coupl ee a une torche a plasma, fluorescence X et dispersion en longueur d'onde, mat eriaux d' etalonnage, sol, l'agriculture urbaine.

show abstract

“…As demonstrated in recent work completed by Perroy et al . () and Weindorf et al . (), portable ED‐XRF is a promising tool for use in urban agriculture/geochemistry investigations.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 86%

mentioning

confidence: 96%

Forty‐Nine Major and Trace Element Concentrations Measured in Soil Reference Materials NIST SRM 2586, 2587, 2709a, 2710a and 2711a Using ICP‐MS and Wavelength Dispersive‐XRF

Byers

McHenry

Grundl

2016

Geostandard Geoanalytic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another advantage is that this instrument is capable of non-invasive analysis thus representing the greenest approach (Garrigues and de la Guardia, 2013). Major and trace elements have successfully been determined by the portable XRF spectrometer in a wide variety of samples: soils (Fujimori and Takigami, 2014), wetland sediments (Perroy et al, 2014), exploration drill cores (Ross et al, 2014), iron meteorites (Gemelli et al, 2015), plants (Krug et al, 2014;Reidinger et al, 2012), oyster shells (Chou et al, 2010), wood (Block et al, 2007), tree and shrub litter (Tighe and Forster, 2014). The other than XRF analytical methods are scarcely used for solid environmental sample analysis in the field.…”

Section: General Characterization and Application Of Field Portable Imentioning

confidence: 99%

Moving your laboratories to the field – Advantages and limitations of the use of field portable instruments in environmental sample analysis

Gałuszka

Migaszewski

Namieśnik

2015

Environmental Research

152

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The GIS model was used by Duke and King (2014) for predicting wetland habitat in the Great Basin where they simulated the drainage of fifty-two pluvial lakes and the extent of associated wetlands was quantified. The results were favorable for several archeological cases, however, further research is needed to clarify the nature and timing of wetland habitat loss.The three dimensional lead contamination mapping and modeling in the wetland sediments from sport shooting activities was conducted(Perroy et al, 2014). They concluded that this study can be used to predict and evaluate the 3D distribution of shot and contaminate sediment at other shooting ranges and contaminates areas worldwide.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment

Martinez‐Guerra

Lee

et al. 2015

Water Environment Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a review of the treatment technologies, which utilize natural processes or passive components in wastewater treatment. In particular, this paper primarily focuses on wetland systems and their applications in wastewater treatment (as an advanced treatment unit or decentralized system), nutrient and pollutant removal (single and multiple pollutants, and metals), and emerging pollutant removal (pharmaceuticals). A summary of studies involving the plant (vegetation) effects, wetland design and modeling, hybrid and innovative systems, storm water treatment and pathogen removal is also included.

show abstract

Mapping and modeling three dimensional lead contamination in the wetland sediments of a former trap-shooting range

Cited by 31 publications

References 42 publications

Forty‐Nine Major and Trace Element Concentrations Measured in Soil Reference Materials NIST SRM 2586, 2587, 2709a, 2710a and 2711a Using ICP‐MS and Wavelength Dispersive‐XRF

Forty‐Nine Major and Trace Element Concentrations Measured in Soil Reference Materials NIST SRM 2586, 2587, 2709a, 2710a and 2711a Using ICP‐MS and Wavelength Dispersive‐XRF

Moving your laboratories to the field – Advantages and limitations of the use of field portable instruments in environmental sample analysis

Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About