2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping an uncertainty zone between interpolated types of a categorical variable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This expression is equivalent to the interpolation variance formula ( [12], p. 491-493) that was proved by ( [14], p. 147). Therefore, the interpolation variance is valid for assessing uncertainties for both continuous and categorical variables.…”
Section: Indicator Kriging and Multiquadric Equationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This expression is equivalent to the interpolation variance formula ( [12], p. 491-493) that was proved by ( [14], p. 147). Therefore, the interpolation variance is valid for assessing uncertainties for both continuous and categorical variables.…”
Section: Indicator Kriging and Multiquadric Equationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Because of the problems described above with computing horizontal indicator variograms, our technique calls for using multiquadric equations as proposed by ( [14], p. 148-150). Further details about multiquadric equations can be found in ( [14], p. 148-150).…”
Section: Indicator Kriging and Multiquadric Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IK yields a unique and smooth solution aiming at local accuracy (Isaaks and Srivastava, 1989;Journel et al, 2000) with the most probable facies category at each grid node (Yamamoto et al, 2012). Due to the smoothing by interpolation methods, variograms computed from IK output facies distributions reveal larger continuity compared with theoretical variograms fitted to the exhaustive dataset, which increase with reducing conditioning wells ( Figure 6B).…”
Section: Facies Interpolationsmentioning
confidence: 97%