2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2010.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Map-projection-independent crater size-frequency determination in GIS environments—New software tool for ArcGIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
256
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 458 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
256
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the right: stratigraphic column showing the correlation of map main units based on observed superposition relationships: undulated contacts represent an erosional relationship; brecciated texture represents generic crater materials pertaining to one of the three crater classes. On the left: time-stratigraphic system for Mercury modified from van Gasselt and Neukum (2011), the dashes inside the solid colours indicate approximate boundaries between periods. The dashed grey lines correlate the map units to the Mercurian periods, based on the estimated ages of SPn, IMP and ICP in literature (Marchi et al, 2013;Neukum, Oberst, Hoffmann, Wagner, & Ivanov, 2001;Ostrach et al, 2015;Whitten et al, 2014) and on the observed relationships.…”
Section: Correlation Of Main Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the right: stratigraphic column showing the correlation of map main units based on observed superposition relationships: undulated contacts represent an erosional relationship; brecciated texture represents generic crater materials pertaining to one of the three crater classes. On the left: time-stratigraphic system for Mercury modified from van Gasselt and Neukum (2011), the dashes inside the solid colours indicate approximate boundaries between periods. The dashed grey lines correlate the map units to the Mercurian periods, based on the estimated ages of SPn, IMP and ICP in literature (Marchi et al, 2013;Neukum, Oberst, Hoffmann, Wagner, & Ivanov, 2001;Ostrach et al, 2015;Whitten et al, 2014) and on the observed relationships.…”
Section: Correlation Of Main Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some images were processed using ISIS3 (Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers v3; Eliason, 1997;Gaddis et al, 1997;, software developed by the USGS, United States Geological Survey). For crater counting and plotting purposes we used Crater Tools (Kneissl, Van Gasselt, & Neukum, 2011) and Craterstats2 (e.g. see Michael & Neukum, 2010).…”
Section: Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured impact craters to determine their size-frequency distribution (SFD) in areas of interest with the CraterTools extension (Kneissl et al, 2011) for the ESRI ArcMap 10 geographic information system program. The CraterTools extension computes a best-fit circle to three user-defined points on a crater rim and records the central latitude, longitude, and diameter to a project database.…”
Section: Crater Size-frequency Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used statistical analyses of crater size-frequency distributions to estimate absolute model ages. For mapping and counting of craters, we used the 'Crater Tool' ArcGIS extension (Kneissl, van Gasselt, & Neukum, 2011). The resulting crater size-frequency curves were analyzed using 'Craterstats2' (Michael & Neukum, 2010) that has been designed to obtain ages of the affected geological units, based on both the chronology function of Hartmann and Neukum (2001) and the production function of Ivanov (2001).…”
Section: Age Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software used for a semi-automatic delineation of knobs was Vextractor. Finally, the 'CraterTool' ArcGIS extension (Kneissl et al, 2011) and 'Craterstats2' software (Michael & Neukum, 2010) were used for statistical analysis of crater size-frequency distributions.…”
Section: Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%