2011
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2011.556118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Map-based multicriteria analysis to support interactive land use allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This stakeholder approach was also chosen to increase flood awareness, and the Vietnamese participants did indeed report to the involved Dutch experts that they have gained knowledge on these topics. However, we have not systematically measured the learning effect, as has been done by Arciniegas et al (2011). The topic of climate change has gained importance in HCMC.…”
Section: Strengths and Limits Of Applied Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This stakeholder approach was also chosen to increase flood awareness, and the Vietnamese participants did indeed report to the involved Dutch experts that they have gained knowledge on these topics. However, we have not systematically measured the learning effect, as has been done by Arciniegas et al (2011). The topic of climate change has gained importance in HCMC.…”
Section: Strengths and Limits Of Applied Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The right of the population to participate in local government affairs through the People's Committee is formalized in the Grassroots Democracy Decree of 1998 (Duong, 2004), which was updated in 2003 and 2007. An interactive approach was applied using a Touch Table (Arciniegas et al, 2011), drawing on large maps, and other tools, with emphasis on creation by the stakeholders, and facilitation by Dutch experts, ensuring that the outcomes of the workshops represented the visions of the participants, which should assure acceptability. Five flood management strategies were developed: (S1) a strategy protecting the district with levees, hence aiming at reducing flood probability; strategies aiming to reduce flood exposure and sensitivity by (S2) wet-, and (S3) dry-proofing buildings; (S4) elevating roads and buildings, aiming to reduce flood exposure; and (S5) a combination of several measures (referred to as "CAS") to reduce flood risk with adjusted land use, which additionally would increase the spatial quality of District 4.…”
Section: Participatory Development Of Flood Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitzimons et al (2012) and Arciniegas et al (2011) incorporate the preferences of the agents over spatial definitions of predefined criteria, in most cases with satellite data and expert opinion. Strager and Rosenberg (2006) also discussed the same problem in the Cacapon River watershed, Virginia, identifying the preferences before defining the maps with GIS.…”
Section: Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on mathematics and statistics, these models tried to incorporate spatial variables in multiple regression models or as land-use conversion probabilities in transition probability matrices. With the progress of computer technology, and especially after the introduction of geographical information systems (GIS), land-use allocation and optimization modelling became more wide-spread [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Land-use optimization models typically involve the optimization of the size as well as the spatial pattern of land use [23].…”
Section: A Land-use Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%