Manual Muscle Testing – Force Profiles and Their Reproducibility

Abstract

The manual muscle test (MMT) is a flexible diagnostic tool, which is used in many disciplines, applied in several ways. The main problem is the subjectivity of the test. The MMT in the version of a “break test” depends on the tester’s force rise and the patient’s ability to resist the applied force. As a first step, the investigation of the reproducibility of the testers’ force profiles is required for valid application. The study examined the force profiles of n=29 testers (n=9 experiences (Exp), n=8 little experienced (LitExp), n =12 beginners (Beg)). The testers performed 10 MMTs according to the test of hip flexors, but against a fixed leg to exclude the patient’s reaction. A handheld device recorded the temporal course of the applied force. The results show significant differences between Exp and Beg concerning the starting force (padj=0.029), the ratio of starting to maximum force (padj=0.005) and the normalized mean Euclidean distances between the 10 trials (padj=0.015). The slope is significantly higher in Exp vs. LitExp (p=0.006) and Beg (p=0.005). The results also indicate that experienced testers show inter-tester differences and partly even a low intra-tester reproducibility. That highlights the necessity of an objective MMT-assessment. Furthermore, an agreement on a standardized force profile is required – a suggestion is given.

Assessment of the Adaptive Force of Elbow Extensors in Healthy Subjects Quantified by a Novel Pneumatically Driven Measurement System with Considerations of Its Quality Criteria

“…Consequently, slightly different pressure increases occurred. However, the elapsed time until AF max was 4.57 ± 0.79 s. From our point of view, this duration is reasonable, but the optimal pressure increase for capturing the AF needs to be discussed and examined in future studies [ 4 ].…”

“…Forces which are generated by human muscles are generally related to the strength of a person, e.g., maximal strength, strength endurance or power [ 1 ]. In addition to such common measures, Adaptive Force (AF) was introduced recently [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. AF not only requires muscle strength but also sensorimotor control.…”

“…However, in daily activities and sports, persons have to deal mainly with external forces which vary in size. The specific task of adapting to varying external forces has been rarely considered in sports or movement science yet [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Such adaptation implies an evident relevance of avoiding an inappropriate lengthening of muscles, accompanied by a destabilization of joints despite an external force impact.…”

“…An inadequate adaptation to increasing forces might result in impaired joint stability. As a possible consequence, injuries or damages of muscles, tendons and joints might occur [ 2 , 4 , 10 , 11 ]. For this reason, assessing AF could be a novel approach to understand the mechanisms behind it and to derive preventive strategies.…”

“…However, different slopes of the force–time curve were suggested in determining the AF during a manual muscle test. These include an exponential phase in the beginning [ 4 ]. Another approach is to use pneumatics.…”