1964
DOI: 10.1080/00207284.1964.11642739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulation of Verbal Behavior of Chronic Hospitalized Schizophrenics in a Group Therapy Situation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of supportive feedback one receives during an interaction also affects expectations of success and hence anxiety. As compared with warm, supportive, noncritical audiences, cold, nonsupportive, or critical ones produce shorter interactions and fewer words spoken (Drennen & Wiggins, 1964;Pope & Siegman, 1968;Reece, 1964;Reece & Whitman, 1962). Subjects who receive negative interpersonal feedback speak less and with longer speech latencies (Cervin, 1956;Miller, 1964;Taylor, Altman, & Sorrentino, 1969) and are less self-disclosing (Taylor et al, 1969).…”
Section: Low Outcome Expectanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of supportive feedback one receives during an interaction also affects expectations of success and hence anxiety. As compared with warm, supportive, noncritical audiences, cold, nonsupportive, or critical ones produce shorter interactions and fewer words spoken (Drennen & Wiggins, 1964;Pope & Siegman, 1968;Reece, 1964;Reece & Whitman, 1962). Subjects who receive negative interpersonal feedback speak less and with longer speech latencies (Cervin, 1956;Miller, 1964;Taylor, Altman, & Sorrentino, 1969) and are less self-disclosing (Taylor et al, 1969).…”
Section: Low Outcome Expectanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pope and Siegman (1968) noted that cold interviews increased speech disturbances, suggesting that they were arousing anxiety. Drennen and Wiggins (1964) studied 10 chronic schizophrenics seen weekly for 10 group-therapy sessions, conducted alternately by a pair of congenial, supportive therapists and a pair of hypercritical, nonsupportive therapists. The cold approach resulted in considerably and significantly reduced interactions in the first session, compared to the warm approach (74 to 136).…”
Section: Interviewer Climatementioning
confidence: 99%