“…From the XPS data in Table S2 (Supporting Information), the N/C ratio for samples in the Fe 1 NC/S 1 -Y series is inversely proportional to the thermal activation temperature, which is in sharp contrast to the proportional correlation between the CO 2 ER activity of Fe 1 NC/S 1 -Y series and thermal activation temperature Figure 3. a) FE CO and b) J CO of Fe 1 NC/S 1 -Y series and NC/S 1 -1000. c) FE CO of Fe 1 NC/S 1 -1000, highlighted by the shaded region, compared to that of other reported state-of-the-art nonprecious metal/N-doped carbon-based SACs with FE CO over 90%: Fe-N 5 , [28] Fe-N-C, [29] Co-N 2 , [30] Ni-NG, [31] NiN-GS, [32] Ni-N-Gr, [33] A-Ni-NSG, [34] Co-N 5 /HNPCSs, [35] COF-367-Co, [36] ZnN x /C, [37] (Cl,N)-Mn/G, [38] and AD-Sn/N-C 1000. [26] d) TOFs of Fe 1 NC/S 1 -1000 compared to that of other reported nonprecious metal/N-doped carbon-based SACs: Fe-N-C, [29] Fe 3+ -N-C, [25] Fe-N 5 , [28] Fe 0.5 d, [39] Co-N 2 , [30] A-Ni-NSG, [34] AD-Sn/N-C, [26] and Co-N 5 /HNPCSs.…”