2013
DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2013.6590054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MANET protocol simulations considered harmful: the case for benchmarking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following best practices for simulation studies [35,46], we rigorously document the evaluation setup to foster reproducibility of our results. The technical platforms of this evaluation are the GT tool EMOFLON [47] and the network evaluation platform SIMONSTRATOR [61] with its contained network simulator PEERFACTSIM.KOM [73], as shown in Figure 26 and as described in detail in the following.…”
Section: Evaluation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following best practices for simulation studies [35,46], we rigorously document the evaluation setup to foster reproducibility of our results. The technical platforms of this evaluation are the GT tool EMOFLON [47] and the network evaluation platform SIMONSTRATOR [61] with its contained network simulator PEERFACTSIM.KOM [73], as shown in Figure 26 and as described in detail in the following.…”
Section: Evaluation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. In [79], authors have discussed that researchers should avoid using default parameters available in the simulators rather these parameters should be modified according to changes in the network. In our proposed simulator, simulation parameters like number of channels, PR activity over these channels, energy model have been modified and the following subsections will cover the details of those layers which have been modified in NS-2 for simulation of CRSN environment.…”
Section: Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the motivations of creating Dockemu, was in fact the same experience of encountering many out of date MANET routing protocols, or protocols that exist only in simulators that never made it to a real world OS implementation. Moreover, works done by Andel et al [3] and Hiranandani et al [2] in the case of MANETs simulation, discuss some of the flaws of tens of dozens of research papers where the simulation results fail to provide the sufficient information so their experiments can be independently repeatable or have tested their experiments with scenarios with default configurations, which do not come close to real life mobility patterns (Example: "Random Waypoint Mobility").…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined in [1], network simulators do not provide the sufficient accuracy, but are great for a first step in protocol testing. Also, the work of [2] and [3] provide some insightful information about the current state of Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) simulation and how we must reconsider the validity of the results obtained through simulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%