1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(64)80522-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibulofacial dysostosis, a familial study of five generations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
4

Year Published

1967
1967
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with the statistical results derived from the literature by Rovin, Dachi, Borenstein, and Cotter (1964).…”
Section: Results Of Investigationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in accordance with the statistical results derived from the literature by Rovin, Dachi, Borenstein, and Cotter (1964).…”
Section: Results Of Investigationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There was no hearing defect. Discussion Mandibulo-facial dysostosis is a familial congenital syndrome of malformations affecting the region derived from the first and second branchial arches, and the first branchial cleft and pouch (Waardenburg and Navis, 1949).…”
Section: Results Of Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 TCS is diagnosed in 1/50 000 live births. 5,6 More than 60% of patients have no positive family history. 7 TCS is characterized by bilateral downward slanting palpebral fissures, frequently accompanied by colobomas of the lower eyelid and a paucity of eyelashes medial to the defect, abnormalities of the external ears, atresia of external auditory canal and bilateral conductive hearing loss, hypoplasia of the zygomatic complex and mandible, and cleft palate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCS has been considered an autosomal dominant condition for decades, 6 its common sporadic occurrence being explained by a high rate of de novo TCOF1 mutations. 7,8 However, recent identification of disease-causing mutations in POLR1C and POLR1D with autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant modes of inheritance pointed to heterogeneity in both the locus and the mode of inheritance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%