Mandibular Angloplasty.

Kim, Hyoun Chull; KAMEYAMA, Tadamitsu

doi:10.2739/kurumemedj.39.147

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 6 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the 2 case reports presented by Kim and Kameyama, focus was placed more on mandibular angloplasty as a primary treatment protocol followed by supplemental myotomy. 25 However, complete resection of the bony angle increases the chances of damage to the inferior alveolar nerve bundle, which restricts the angloplasty only below the nerve canal. A similar technique was proposed by Wood, which involved resection of only the bony protuberance of mandibular angle without removing any parts of the masseter muscle.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy and Role of Adjunctive Surgical Procedures

Anehosur

Mehra

Kumar

2020

Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and Objectives: The aim of this case series is to retrospectively analyze cases of masseter muscle hypertrophy and the surgical procedures carried out for their treatment in SDM craniofacial unit, Dharwad. The main objectives taken into account are the adjunctive procedures such as genioplasty and coronoidectomy, which help improve the esthetics and mouth opening of the patients postoperatively. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case series was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SDM craniofacial unit, Dharwad, from 2010 to 2015. A total of 5 cases were operated on during this period. Orthopantomograms, computed tomography scans of the head and neck region, and lateral cephalograms of each patient were taken into account. Data were collected to study the treatment protocols and the adjunctive procedures, which helped improve the results of the surgery. Results: Of the 5 patients operated in the last 5 years, surgical debulking of the masseter muscle was the optimal treatment followed with genioplasty, which provided improved esthetics from the square-shaped jaw appearance. Coronoidectomy was helpful in increasing mouth opening in patients with trismus. Conclusion: The case series was not only carried out to enunciate causes of masseter muscle hypertrophy and its complications but also to discuss optimal treatment protocols along with adjunctive procedures to enhance the postoperative results and patient satisfaction.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy and Role of Adjunctive Surgical Procedures

Anehosur

Mehra

Kumar

2020

Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After removal of the bandage it is necessary to institute mouth opening exercises. Kim and Kameyama, 28 in their reported case suggested that angloplasty without muscle resection is also a treatment of choice in some cases of masseteric hypertrophy. Other investigators also documented that surgical resection of mandibular angle alone would give good treatment outcomes.…”

Section: Management Of Masseter Hypertrophymentioning

confidence: 97%

Masseteric Hypertrophy: An Orthodontic Perspective

Kumar

Pillai

2012

JIOS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Masseteric hypertrophy, popularly called the benign masseteric hypertrophy (BMH) or idiopathic masseteric hypertrophy (IMH) is a relatively uncommon condition characterized by asymptomatic enlargement of one or both masseter muscles and is rarely accompanied by pain, which is often confused with parotid swelling. Most frequently, clinicians are consulted for swelling of angle of mandible which needs to be corrected for cosmetic reasons. Although it is tempting to produce malocclusions, bruxism, clenching, temporomandibular joint disorders, the etiology in majority of the cases are unknown. The purpose of this review is to have a discussion on the effects of masseter muscle on craniofacial morphology, its implication in different types of malocclusion and contemporary orthodontic management and stability.

show abstract

“…Generally, the patient's complaint is aesthetic (Pereira et al, 2006;Rispoli et al, 2008;Trento et al, 2017;Ayhan et al, 2018), due to asymmetry, when unilateral, or due to a very wide face, when bilateral (Pary and Pary, 2011;Trento et al, 2017;Anehosur et al, 2020). The bilateral condition is more common (Kim and Kameyama, 1992). Unilateral hypertrophy is mainly since 78% of the population has one preferred side in mastication (Almukhtar and Fabi, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, it is not a definitive treatment option, as muscle function returns after 3-6 months following application (Pary and Pary, 2011;Bravo et al, 2016;Almukhtar and Fabi, 2019). Surgical treatment was first described by Gurney in 1947 and was based on partial removal of the masseter muscle through an extraoral approach (Kim and Kameyama, 1992;Oliveira et al, 2004;Kim et al, 2005;Rispoli et al, 2008;Tabrizi et al, 2010;Andreishchev et al, 2014;Trento et al, 2017). Wood suggested the resection of the mandibular angle, without manipulation of the masseter, by intraoral access (Tabrizi et al, 2010;Özkan et al, 2012;Ayhan et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Wood suggested the resection of the mandibular angle, without manipulation of the masseter, by intraoral access (Tabrizi et al, 2010;Özkan et al, 2012;Ayhan et al, 2018). In 1949, Adams proposed associating partial muscle resection with resection of the mandibular angle (Kim and Kameyama, 1992;Oliveira et al, 2004;Rispoli et al, 2008;Andreishchev et al, 2014). Given the fact that the goal of the treatment is to achieve the aesthetic result, the intraoral access was introduced, avoiding scars and/or nerve damage in the marginal branch of the facial nerve (Andreishchev et al, 2014;Trento et al, 2017;Almukhtar and Fabi, 2019), being described by Converse in 1951 (Kim and Kameyama, 1992;Kim et al, 2005;Andreishchev et al, 2014;Trento et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of a Questionnaire for Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy: A Case Report

Bin,

Pavelski,

Fernandes

et al. 2023

Prague Med. Rep.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Masseter hypertrophy (MH) is an uncommon natural condition that affects the facial contour. The etiology is debatable, and complaints are usually cosmetic in nature. The diagnosis is essentially clinical and aided by imaging tests. Treatment is still controversial. The literature is relatively scarce in relation to information on MH, particularly in the evaluation of outcomes. Through questionnaires, the progress was observed in the evaluation of the outcomes of aesthetic procedures. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to apply a Facelift Outcome Evaluation (FOE) questionnaire to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment in a case of MH. A 23-year-old male presented to the clinic complaining of bullying due to his facial aesthetics. Clinical and imaging evaluation was performed, with the creation of surgical guides. The patient answered the FOE questionnaire pre- and postoperatively, with results of 12.5 and 100.00 respectively. This subjectively shows the success of the treatment. We suggest that a questionnaire applied exclusively to masseter hypertrophy should be developed, as well as studies for the development of muscle volume measurement protocols, aiming at a more specific evaluation of the surgical outcomes.

show abstract

Mandibular Angloplasty.

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

Management of Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy and Role of Adjunctive Surgical Procedures

Management of Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy and Role of Adjunctive Surgical Procedures

Masseteric Hypertrophy: An Orthodontic Perspective

Use of a Questionnaire for Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy: A Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About