The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcom.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing uncertainty and expectations: The strategic response of U.S. agricultural cooperatives to agricultural industrialization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial and economic expansion of agro-industrial food systems can cause productive and livelihood exclusion of small farmers, and local and regional effects such as deforestation, competition for water resources, concentration of land ownership, low generation of employment, health impacts, increased carbon footprint, decreased energy efficiency and increased nonreusable waste [92]. Hogeland [103] studied the response of agricultural cooperatives to the industrialization of agriculture in the United States in the 20th century, which challenged the primacy of family farming by disseminating a competitive production model based on vertical integration. Decisions commonly made by family farmers, such as what to produce, where, when, and for what market, were co-opted by the corporate hierarchy.…”
Section: New Pathways For Sustainable Rural Development and Emerging Complexitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial and economic expansion of agro-industrial food systems can cause productive and livelihood exclusion of small farmers, and local and regional effects such as deforestation, competition for water resources, concentration of land ownership, low generation of employment, health impacts, increased carbon footprint, decreased energy efficiency and increased nonreusable waste [92]. Hogeland [103] studied the response of agricultural cooperatives to the industrialization of agriculture in the United States in the 20th century, which challenged the primacy of family farming by disseminating a competitive production model based on vertical integration. Decisions commonly made by family farmers, such as what to produce, where, when, and for what market, were co-opted by the corporate hierarchy.…”
Section: New Pathways For Sustainable Rural Development and Emerging Complexitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the more access farmers in obtaining financial resources, the higher the quality of broiler farmer. Huang et al (2018) says that contract farming has been increasingly found to benefit smallholders in developing countries, yet much less is known about its role in the poultry industry where economies of scale could be more prominent, but direct experience with producer contracting allowed cooperatives to evade institutional and ideological lock-in (Hogeland 2015).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Human Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transaction cost economics, associated with Ronald Coase and Oliver Williamson, has been highly influential in much social science research in recent decades, and bears significant potential for explaining important aspects of the economic behavior of farmers, farm organizations, agricultural businesses, and farm policymakers. 39 Among other insights, transaction cost economics offers a mode for understanding and explaining the boundaries between markets, firms, and states-clearly a matter of interest in agricultural history, particularly in relation to farm policy. Heterodox approaches to economics, including evolutionary economics and behavioral economics, could deepen our historical understanding of farmers' embeddedness in complicated and dynamic organizations and markets.…”
Section: Possibilities For Theory and Theorizing In Agricultural Historymentioning
confidence: 99%