Abstract:The psychic life of organizations is often fraught with distress and unhappiness. Often, the primary task of the organization is hijacked by deeper, primitive, unconscious forces, to divert the work towards more destructive functioning. This article describes three main dynamics in the organizational life of a voluntary organization, which can lead to the acting out of deeper sexual and aggressive impulses. These dynamics focus on how erotic, idealized, and envied relationships can significantly interfere with… Show more
“…Although power may not be equally distributed in an organization, if the right conditions can be negotiated (mainly if anxiety can be kept within reasonable bounds) the process of team communication facilitated by a group analyst will tend towards an equality of interaction. This enables understanding of a situation in the round, and allows the managed to feel more valued, and the manager to be more comfortable with disagreement and diverse views (Kapur, 2009). It is closely aligned to the value of difference.…”
Section: Tolerance and Value Of Multiple Perspectivesmentioning
Several aspects of group analysis render it a useful discipline for consulting to organizations and working with teams in complex post-modern environments. These include attention to the individual in the group, sophisticated grasp of the nuances of interpersonal communication, attention to context, tolerance and the value of multiple perspectives, creative incorporation of difference and a flexible developmental approach to managing anxiety and leadership projections. The importance assigned to context, and the value placed on multiple perspectives as holding elements of reality, mesh with systems and complexity theories so that group analysis offers a coherent intellectual framework for understanding interplaying processes in the system, from individual, through team, departmental and organizational, to societal and global levels. While several writers have demonstrated the value of group analytic thinking in understanding organizations, to date none have attempted to contextualize their perspective with those of others working in the field. This article opens with a literature review, articulates some core contextual differences between clinical and organizational work, and identifies the characteristics of group analysis that make it a valuable discipline in organizational work. A second companion article elaborates, setting out further differences in praxis in organizational rather than therapeutic work and discussing contracting for organizational work.
“…Although power may not be equally distributed in an organization, if the right conditions can be negotiated (mainly if anxiety can be kept within reasonable bounds) the process of team communication facilitated by a group analyst will tend towards an equality of interaction. This enables understanding of a situation in the round, and allows the managed to feel more valued, and the manager to be more comfortable with disagreement and diverse views (Kapur, 2009). It is closely aligned to the value of difference.…”
Section: Tolerance and Value Of Multiple Perspectivesmentioning
Several aspects of group analysis render it a useful discipline for consulting to organizations and working with teams in complex post-modern environments. These include attention to the individual in the group, sophisticated grasp of the nuances of interpersonal communication, attention to context, tolerance and the value of multiple perspectives, creative incorporation of difference and a flexible developmental approach to managing anxiety and leadership projections. The importance assigned to context, and the value placed on multiple perspectives as holding elements of reality, mesh with systems and complexity theories so that group analysis offers a coherent intellectual framework for understanding interplaying processes in the system, from individual, through team, departmental and organizational, to societal and global levels. While several writers have demonstrated the value of group analytic thinking in understanding organizations, to date none have attempted to contextualize their perspective with those of others working in the field. This article opens with a literature review, articulates some core contextual differences between clinical and organizational work, and identifies the characteristics of group analysis that make it a valuable discipline in organizational work. A second companion article elaborates, setting out further differences in praxis in organizational rather than therapeutic work and discussing contracting for organizational work.
“…The resulting tensions loosely translate into the Freudian concept of the reality principle, as they imply a resisting of our moment-to-moment impulses towards pleasure. 1 Such a psychoanalytic approach to the investigation of the stress of work was later taken up by Elliot Jaques 2 and others ‘…to pay serious attention to the intrapsychic and interpersonal processes within any organization’ 3 including workplaces.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.