Managing Human Activity and Tourism Impacts: A Case Study of Zeke's Island Reserve, North Carolina

Abstract

Managers are consistently challenged to reconcile the impacts of recreational activity and tourism with protection of the integrity of the natural resources upon which these experiences depend. In the absence of opportunities for active resource management, the ability of natural mitigation processes to sustain natural resources becomes a critical attribute of resource viability. This case study, therefore, examines the relationship between natural mitigation processes and a specific form of tourist management—signage—on the Zeke's Island Component of the North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve Program (NCNERR). The island features of the Zeke's Island Component of the NCNERR are primarily accessible by small boat. Activities common for tourists to engage in at the Reserve are fishing, swimming, hiking, bird watching, and camping. Phase # of the study examined whether, given the absence of visitor management, natural processes mitigate recreation and tourism impacts caused by these activities. Phase #2 of the study examined whether the use of signs is an effective passive management technique in restricting recreation and tourism camping behavior. The results of the study indicate that: 1) natural processes mitigate most, but not all, recreation and tourism impacts on the subject site, and 2) signage can be an effective approach for passively managing human behavior and tourism in natural resource settings.

Factors Affecting Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes Regarding North Carolina Coastal Reserve Management

“…Additionally, many managers do not have direct day-to-day contact with users and thus may be either unaware of or misunderstand user perceptions (Buerger et al, 1990;Buerger & Pasquarello, 1992, 1994Herstine et al, 2006). Ormsby and Kaplin (2005) point out the need for managers to establish strong communications with users to help inform users of management goals and gauge user perceptions of management.…”

“…Compatible "traditional" activities (such as birdwatching and fishing) are allowed on the sites under the enabling North Carolina Statute ("Coastal Zone Management Act," 1972). However, when visitor use pressure becomes too intense or non-compatible activities are undertaken by visitors, damage to the pristine nature of the sites can occur (Buerger et al, 2000;Herstine et al, 2006).…”