The role of research in the training of an obstetrician and gynaecologist Sir, Professor Thomas's commentary on the role of research in training correctly addresses the problems faced by many trainees and his solutions are a model for the ideal world. The reality is that trainees feel that a second qualification and a large number of publications are obligatory in order to obtain a Senior Registrar appointment, often to the detriment of their clinical skills and their bedside manner. This is further perpetuated by appointment committees who base their shortlists and appointments on these criteria without giving emphasis to extra clinical skills or to the quality of patient care. In this sense and at a time when the nature of specialist training in the United Kingdom is the focus of much debate we feel that the experience of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Northampton General Hospital deserves a mention.In 198Y this department purchased a transvaginal probe for the gynaecological outpatients department ultrasound scanner. After attending a training course, one of the registrars initiated a monitoring service for patients undergoing ovulation induction therapy with gonadotrophins. This was based on a 7 day, 12 h availability of this registrar (on bleep) and resulted in a dramatic increase in the pregnancy rate (33.3% per couple after a maximum of six treatment cycles) associated with a significant reduction (28.5%) in the number of referrals to tertiary centres for assisted conception over the next three years. Transvaginal ultrasound has already been shown to be safe and accurate (Jansen & Van 0 s 1989) and this method of monitoring has been reported as the main reason for the low incidence of high order multiple pregnancy and the low incidence of and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (Shoham etal. 1991) which was confirmed in our results.This scanner was further used in the management of pain and bleeding in early pregnancy, resulting in reduced hospital stay and anxiety for many patients as they could either be directly placed on to an emergency operating list or discharged home. It improved clinical management of ectopic pregnancy as these cases were diagnosed earlier and could be managed conservatively often using laparoscopic surgery confirming previous findings (Magos et al. 1989) and enabled us to use use the gynaecological operating theatres more effectively. Finally it benefited the registrars who were able to clock up several thousand scans as well as adequately inform and counsel patients about these procedures.We feel sure that the quality of patient care and of the training of junior staff is as important as good clinical research and that ways should be found to assess this objectively when appointments are made to higher positions in a properly organised, continually assessed and audited specialist training programme.
Lawrence Mascarenhas
371-374.Sir, Professor Eric Thomas (January 1993) has written a valuable commentary on the role of research in the training of obstetric...