Managing disruptions during the execution phase of product development projects: A secondary data analysis

Marketing Planning in Housing Construction

“…In the article the example of LLC "Evrobud SM" was used to demonstrate choice and assessment of factors by means of which business performance and market attractiveness are calculated for creation a General Electric matrix. To determine the list of factors by means of which market attractiveness [5] and business performance of LLC "Evrobud SM" will be estimated, the expert focus group of 8 people consisting of representatives, planned treasury division and company marketing department was created. The expert method and acceptance of enquiry «erector» by L.S.…”

“…To determine the list of factors by means of which market attractiveness [5] and business performance of LLC "Evrobud SM" will be estimated, the expert focus group of 8 people consisting of representatives, planned treasury division and company marketing department was created. For enhancing the experts' opinion assessment objectivity, "L.S.…”

Analysis of the Consequences of Disrupting Events on Ongoing Product Development Projects: The Cascading Effects of Severe Influences

“…The problem with these literatures is that they either try to analyse the problem with a too narrow scope or try to foresee "a priori" the cause and effect relationships during such events. It seems there is a lack of literature that aims to analyse disruptions with a comprehensive view that ICED19 explores disruptions of ongoing product development projects by exploring the organizational and market environment of such projects (Clausen et al, 2001, Eden et al, 2000, Guaragni et al, 2017.…”

“…Moreover, the lack of specific content related to this topic in the engineering literature led to the conclusion that analysing existing cases was a sensible choice. Previous research (Guaragni et al, 2018, Guaragni et al, 2017 proved that by analysing cases in the literature, it is possible to better understand disruptions of ongoing product development projects. For instance, it is possible to classify disruptions not only by its initial causes (or influencing factors), but also by the behaviour of cascading events that occur during a disruption.…”

“…For instance, the main difference between these two occurrences is the severity of the consequences of these events. In particular, when referring to a product, it is possible to "… consider as a disruption every influencing factor that might strongly interfere with the development of the products or severely compromise their success on the market" (Guaragni et al, 2017). However, when such influence is so severe that the premises of the development itself are compromised and the scale of the critical situation might reduce the priority of resuming the development process too much, then the situation escalates into a crisis, since the situation might have become so complex that the priority of the company could be survival itself.…”