Managing competing institutional logics in governance of public-sector entities in Tanzania

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to investigate how the governance practices of public-sector entities (PSEs) in Tanzania are shaped by competing institutional logics and strategies used to manage the logics.Design/methodology/approachIn the paper, empirical evidence was gathered through documentary sources, non-participant observations and in-depth interviews with members of boards of directors (BoDs), chief executive officers (CEOs), internal and external auditors, senior executives and ministry officials. The data were analyzed using thematic and pattern-matching approaches.FindingsThe paper shows that bureaucratic and market logics co-exist and variations in governance practices within and across categories of PSEs. These are reflected in CEO appointments, multiple roles of CEOs, board member appointments, board composition, multiple board membership, board roles and evaluation of board performance. External audits also foster market logic in governance practices. The two competing logics are managed by actors through selective coupling, compromise, decoupling and compartmentalization. Despite competing logics, the bureaucratic logic remains dominant and is largely responsible for variations between the underlying logics and governance practices.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that public-sector reforms in emerging economies (EEs) must account for the fact that governance practices in PSEs are shaped by different institutional logics embedded in socioeconomic, political and organizational contexts and their corresponding management strategies.Originality/valueFew previous studies explicitly report relationships between institutional logics and the governance practices of PSEs in EEs. The current study is one of few empirical studies to connect competing institutional logics and the associated management strategies, as well as governance practices in EEs in the context of public-sector reforms.

Strategic planning practices and their impact on activating financial governance in public organizations An applied study on Telecom Egypt

“…Furthermore, financial governance is one of the important tools used in promoting economic performance competitiveness factors of the organizations, increasing the value added, and activating the role of executive and top management (Kamaruddin et al, 2021). Mzenzi and Gaspar (2021) show that, financial governance enhances the public organizations' competitiveness by improving the performance of internal and external auditors through the principles of competitiveness and the role played by border of directors and executive officials, in addition to enhancing the organizational structure with view to promoting financial performance, activating accountability on different levels, expanding the participation in accountability, and setting the necessary plans (Stafford and Stapleton, 2021). Xue and Niu (2019) emphasize that, transparency and accountability are necessary to activate financial governance, especially concerning the financial results and reports and disseminating them on all levels, along with the existence of administrative system ensuring the easiness of communications and information circulation.…”

Corporate governance regulation in regulatory space of a developing country: actors, strategies and outcomes

“…SECP not only introduced CG codes 2002 in line with an Anglo-Saxon model but also adopted a compromised strategy to ease compliance with these codes. If competing logics exists, then compliance may result in decoupling, compromises and selective coupling (Mzenzi and Gaspar, 2022). Similarly, findings revealed that even these toothless codes faced active resistance from family businesses.…”