Managing climate risks through social capital in agrifood supply chains

Abstract

Purpose Despite several contributions to greenhouse gas emission and carbon footprint reduction, the literature lacks empirical insights into the business impact of climate risks, when they materialize, and techniques to manage them. This study aims to devise a model delving into critical climate risks and the role of consortia and social capital to mitigate these risks. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods approach was used, including qualitative and quantitative data from small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in an Australian agrifood supply chain (AFSC). Findings The qualitative analysis uncovers four critical climate risks and a repertoire of relational, structural, and cognitive social capital accrued by SMEs of AFSC through consortia. The quantitative analysis corroborates that the SMEs that accumulate higher social capital through active engagement within consortia are able to respond more effectively to climate risks than to others. The authors, therefore, find that climate risk mitigation in SMEs is the function of both association (consortia) membership and the accrual of higher social capital through active involvement and collaboration within networks. Originality/value This is the first study in using a moderated-moderation model that simultaneously investigates the business impact of climate risks and how the moderating impact of consortia (a primary moderator) is further moderated by social capital (a secondary moderator) in explaining SMEs performance. The paper addresses the lack of adequate empirical research, particularly mixed-methods, in supply chain risk management literature.

The impact of corporate support programs on environmental and social innovation: empirical insights from the food and beverage industry

“…There is burgeoning research on the role of OM strategy and practices in achieving environmental and social sustainability (Abdul-Rashid et al. , 2017; Ali and Gölgeci, 2020; Bendoly et al. , 2021; Dai et al.…”

The Role of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Mitigating Supply Chain Disruption: Empirical Evidence From the Australian Food Processing Industry

“…Consistent with the research questions, we employed a quantitative research method with an online survey as the primary data collection tool. The data were collected from senior managers of firms within the Australian FPI-one of the largest manufacturers and suppliers of premium quality foods across the globe [50], [67]-which transforms fresh agricultural products into a number of processed foods (cheese, bread, cakes, meat, biscuits, savory snacks, etc.) and beverages (wine, energy drinks, soft drinks, hot drinks, etc.).…”

Reimagining global food value chains through effective resilience to COVID-19 shocks and similar future events: A dynamic capability perspective

“…Around two-thirds of Australian food products are exported to various countries of the world. The firms in the Australian GFVC are amongst the major suppliers of premium quality food to about 40 countries across the globe (Ali & Gölgeci, 2020;Ali & Aboelmaged, 2021). However, in the wake of the current pandemic, these value chains have been grappling with several upheavals, for example, border closures, disrupted port operations, strict quarantine measures, which triggered formidable challenges of stock piling, food supply shortages and price manipulation (Australian Food & Grocery Council, 2019).…”