Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3312662.3312683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial Ability and Dividend Payout Policy during Global Financial Crisis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are in support of Lintner (1956) dividend smoothing theory that assume managers with high ability positively affect the dividend payout policy only if they are confident to keep the same level of dividend or increase the dividend in future with the lower level of default risk on their debt obligations (Charitou et al , 2011). These results are in consistency with the findings of Ming et al (2019) that higher ability managers of financially unconstrained and strong balance sheet firms pay higher dividends. Furthermore, Pathan et al (2016) reported that increase in dividend payment by financially constrained firm leads to poorer operating performance than non-financially constrained firms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Results are in support of Lintner (1956) dividend smoothing theory that assume managers with high ability positively affect the dividend payout policy only if they are confident to keep the same level of dividend or increase the dividend in future with the lower level of default risk on their debt obligations (Charitou et al , 2011). These results are in consistency with the findings of Ming et al (2019) that higher ability managers of financially unconstrained and strong balance sheet firms pay higher dividends. Furthermore, Pathan et al (2016) reported that increase in dividend payment by financially constrained firm leads to poorer operating performance than non-financially constrained firms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Upper Echelons Theory (Gan, 2019;Yung & Chen, 2018;Huang & Sun, 2017;Andreou et al, 2016;Francis et al, 2016) (Ge et al, 2011) (Demerjian et al, 2012) (Choi et al, 2015) 2017 (Akbari et al, 2018) 2019 (Rahman et al, 2020) (Huang & Sun, 2017) (Gan, 2019;Lee et al, 2018;Habib & Hasan, 2017) (Hessian, 2018) (Demerjian et al, 2013) (Adut et al, 2019 (Magerakis & Tzelepis, 2019;Aliahmadi et al, 2016;Siao & Chou, 2015) (González et al, 2019) Accounting Financial Performance (Ferreira et al, 2019) (Del Gaudio et al, 2020) 2019 (Elamir & Mousa, 2019;Huang et al, 2014) Management of Accounting Disclosure Tone (Mansurov, 2020) (Huang et al, 2014) (Melloni et al, 2017) 2019 (Kang et al, 2017) (Carlsson & Sörenson, 2015) Impression Management (Ataullah et al, 2018) (Huang et al, 2018) (Fisher et al, 2020) Financial Misconduct Allegations 2019 (Campbell et al, 2019;Baginski et al, 2018;Ahmed & Hussainey, 2017) 2 / 3 2016 (Setiawan et al, 2016;Thanatawee, 2013) ( Chowdhury & Rahman, 2019;Ming et al, 2019;…”
Section: / 1 (Hessian 2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growth of the number of studies on firm reputation, there is no consensus on a comprehensive definition of firm reputation. In their study, Ming et al (2019) express that the lack of a comprehensive definition of reputation is the multidisciplinary nature of related studies that causes the topic to be assessed from different views. Each field of study, such as economics, accounting, sociology, and strategy, has a certain definition of reputation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%