Management paradigms in personnel magazines of the Finnish metal and forest industries

Abstract

Purpose -The paper seeks to examine the manifestation of management paradigms in personnel magazines of Finnish metal and forest industry corporations from the 1930s to recent years. Design/methodology/approach -The research data consist of articles of personnel magazines on management. The articles were analyzed by quantitative and qualitative content analysis. Findings -The findings indicate that normative paradigms, such as industrial betterment, human relations school, and cultural theories, have been discussed in personnel magazines more than rational paradigms, although earlier studies suggest that in general rational management paradigms have been more influential in Finland. The frequent use of normative paradigms can be seen as a tool in enforcing the role of personnel journals in generating a sense of belonging and togetherness among employees. Normative paradigms are also discussed more frequently in the articles that are written from the viewpoint of the worker than those written from the viewpoint of the manager or company. Originality/value -The study offers empirical evidence on the adoption of management paradigms in different lines of industries. It also shows that personnel magazines provide a rich and interesting source of data that could be used more frequently than has traditionally been the case.

Psychological management: changing qualities of the ideal manager in Finland 1949‐2009

“…Surprisingly, workplace relationships, which Miller and Rose (2008, pp. 178-179) attach to the earlier human relations school, did not gain as much significance as job benefit during the same period, although they were visible in the industrial personnel magazines of the time (Kuokkanen et al, 2010). This supports Seeck's argument (2008, p. 280;Seeck and Laakso, 2010) that the human relations school did not have a significant initial influence in Finland, but rather slowly increased its importance over a long period, although never becoming the dominant paradigm.…”

‘An army of our own’: Legitimating the professional position of HR through well-being at work

“…However, these ideals and practices were challenged by NPM thinking, according to which they undermined performance and lacked sufficient rewards for individual contribution (Truss 2008). In the mid-1980s, HRM as a distinct approach to employment management had entered Finnish work organizations (Kuokkanen et al 2010;Vanhala 1995). HRM emphasizes employees as valuable resources to invest in and develop, proactive strategic orientation in employee management on behalf of HR practitioners, strong line management responsibility and concern for performance (Guest 1987;Storey 1992).…”

“…Additional pressures stemmed from local and national governments that criticized the quality of public services and propagated an ideology that favoured competition and private sector management (Bach & Kessler 2007). Simultaneously, HRM (Human Resource Management), as a distinct approach to employment management, had entered and gained favour in Finnish work organizations (Kuokkanen et al 2010;Vanhala 1995). Consequently, HR practitioners as a professional group in public organizations were targeted by pressures from local and national governments to adopt NPM managerial logics, to become more business-like and, hence, contribute to individual, organizational and financial performance (Bach & Bordogna 2011;Bach & Kessler 2007;Harris 2007;Truss 2008;Truss 2013).…”

A review of management history from 2010-2014 utilizing a thematic analysis approach

“…These studies present historical evidence of business experiences in a particular country that can be applied to researchers and practitioners in other countries. During this time period, researchers have studied business in the following countries: Finland (Verje et al, 2013;Kuokkanen et al, 2010;Seeck and Laakso, 2010), China (Gong et al, 2013;Rothschild et al, 2012), The Netherlands (Baalen andKarsten, 2010), the USA (Hilsenrath, 2012), Norway (Mack, 2010), Lebanon (2012), New Zealand (Cardow et al, 2011), Spain (Maixé-Altés, 2010 and Japan (Bowden and Insch, 2013;Vaszkun and Tsutsui, 2012). By studying historical events in different regions of the world, we can increase our knowledge of how to effectively manage international business relationships in today's global economy.…”