Management of Urban Waters with Nature-Based Solutions in Circular Cities—Exemplified through Seven Urban Circularity Challenges

Abstract

Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) have been proven to effectively mitigate and solve resource depletion and climate-related challenges in urban areas. The COST (Cooperation in Science and Technology) Action CA17133 entitled “Implementing nature-based solutions (NBS) for building a resourceful circular city” has established seven urban circularity challenges (UCC) that can be addressed effectively with NBS. This paper presents the outcomes of five elucidation workshops with more than 20 European experts from different backgrounds. These international workshops were used to examine the effectiveness of NBS to address UCC and foster NBS implementation towards circular urban water management. A major outcome was the identification of the two most relevant challenges for water resources in urban areas: ‘Restoring and maintaining the water cycle’ (UCC1) and ‘Water and waste treatment, recovery, and reuse’ (UCC2). s Moreover, significant synergies with ‘Nutrient recovery and reuse’, ‘Material recovery and reuse’, ‘Food and biomass production’, ‘Energy efficiency and recovery’, and ‘Building system recovery’ were identified. Additionally, the paper presents real-life case studies to demonstrate how different NBS and supporting units can contribute to the UCC. Finally, a case-based semi-quantitative assessment of the presented NBS was performed. Most notably, this paper identifies the most typically employed NBS that enable processes for UCC1 and UCC2. While current consensus is well established by experts in individual NBS, we presently highlight the potential to address UCC by combining different NBS and synergize enabling processes. This study presents a new paradigm and aims to enhance awareness on the ability of NBS to solve multiple urban circularity issues.

The Social, Political, and Environmental Dimensions in Designing Urban Public Space from a Water Management Perspective: Testing European Experiences

“…It was expected that projects rethink and reinvent themselves as water-smart cities, following an NBS solutionorientation criterion in which "nature" does not provide solutions by traditional linearity, but evolves from experimentation, evaluation, and adaptive learning [65]. This point can reinforce, for example, shifting from drained to sponge cities, using reclaimed water while still generating chances to green the city and improve liveability [66]. Some of the analysed projects include NBS in the form of UGI (e.g., planting trees and plants and connecting green spaces).…”

Costs-benefit Analysis for the use of Shallow Groundwater as non-conventional Water Resource

“…Supplying water needs for a growing population in urban areas under climate change scenarios requires to rethink water resources management, as water withdrawals continue to grow and, in parallel, resources become less available (Thomas and Durham 2003;Salgot et al 2012;Strzepek et al 2010;UN 2018;Cook et al 2018;. Mukherjee et al 2018;Boretti and Rosa 2019;Ferrasso et al 2021;Heidari et al 2021;Oral et al 2021). Commonly freshwaters are still consumed to satisfy non-potable water uses, although it is estimated that the systematic exploitation of alternative resources could reduce the domestic water consumption up to 50% (Cureau and Ghisi 2019).…”

A Framework to Evaluate the Social Life Cycle Impact of Products under the Circular Economy Thinking

“…Particularly, studies have analyzed how and when the concept of CE is able to contribute to economic development, environmental preservation and social cohesion [11,12]. Though the current literature places great emphasis on the environmental and economic dimensions, there is limited research on the social dimension [2,13,14].…”