2020
DOI: 10.4097/kja.20022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of perioperative volume therapy – monitoring and pitfalls

Abstract: Anesthesiologists play an important role in the perioperative process by assessing the overall risk of surgery, including the risk factors of the surgical procedure and those of the patient. There have been substantial developments over the last few decades regarding the risk of anesthesia. In the early days of anesthesia, the risk of the anesthetic procedure itself was high and led to a number of fatalities [1,2]. This has changed dramatically, and these days anesthesia-related deaths are extremely low. Such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hemodilution due to volume overload represents a potential cause for low hemoglobin levels. Hb concentration alone is therefore insufficient for a diagnosis of postoperative anemia, given its influence by plasma volume derangements, which may result in overdiagnosis [ 19 ]. In cases of uncomplicated recovery from surgery, a nadir in Hb concentration is mostly observed within the first 3–4 days [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemodilution due to volume overload represents a potential cause for low hemoglobin levels. Hb concentration alone is therefore insufficient for a diagnosis of postoperative anemia, given its influence by plasma volume derangements, which may result in overdiagnosis [ 19 ]. In cases of uncomplicated recovery from surgery, a nadir in Hb concentration is mostly observed within the first 3–4 days [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that context, echocardiographic dynamic indices, such as peak flow, velocity-time integral of the ascending aorta or carotid artery and diameter of the inferior or superior vena cava, have also emerged as useful predictors of fluid responsiveness [ 12 , 14 ]. However, these indices are also subject to the same inherent limitations related to heart–lung interaction [ 15 ]. By contrast, static preload indices, such as invasive filling pressures and non-invasive echocardiographic variables, can be readily and reliably assessed at end-expiration atmospheric pressure, regardless of the ventilatory status or heart rhythm of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%