2009
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09x420761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of common gastrointestinal disorders: quality criteria based on patients' views and practice guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been previously seen in Spain that nearly three out of four IBD patients reported being satisfied with the quality of the healthcare received but that the information they received was inadequate (14). At present, patients suffering from gastrointestinal disorders identified some issues which were rated as being more important: the need for better explanations and more written information from clinicians, access to patient organisations and patient groups, consistency and coordination between GPs and hospital management and identifying disease-specific concerns and recommendations for defining outcomes that were relevant to patients (15). This lack of information is perceived not only by IBD patients, it has also been reported that almost a 60 % of cancer survivors do not received enough information on health promotion or prevention topics (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been previously seen in Spain that nearly three out of four IBD patients reported being satisfied with the quality of the healthcare received but that the information they received was inadequate (14). At present, patients suffering from gastrointestinal disorders identified some issues which were rated as being more important: the need for better explanations and more written information from clinicians, access to patient organisations and patient groups, consistency and coordination between GPs and hospital management and identifying disease-specific concerns and recommendations for defining outcomes that were relevant to patients (15). This lack of information is perceived not only by IBD patients, it has also been reported that almost a 60 % of cancer survivors do not received enough information on health promotion or prevention topics (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is well under way, and there is hope that providers will soon treat patients within a framework of evidence-based quality measures. For example, in the United Kingdom, as part of the Improving Management in Gastroenterology (IMAGE) project, quality criteria for IBD were recently proposed based on both patients' views and existing practice guidelines [28]. Recommendations from this group included the need for early and accurate diagnosis, clearly stated mechanisms for patient follow-up, access to specialists, dietary advice, support organizations, and other items deemed appropriate based on the group's pre-stated quality criteria-setting process.…”
Section: Ibd: the Need For Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La asistencia a pacientes con síntomas digestivos supone el 10% de los motivos de consulta en atención primaria (AP) 1,2 . En nuestro medio, las derivaciones a las consultas de digestivo representan entre el 3,7 y el 4,2% 3,4 de las derivaciones a atención especializada (AE).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified