2021
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2021.1981131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management innovation and firm innovation performance: a moderated moderation effects of absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study utilizes a 7-point scale closed-ended survey questionnaire items ( Boadu et al, 2021b ; Xie et al, 2022a ). We designed our scales in English, translated them to Chinese, and back to English to ensure their reliability ( Brislin, 1970 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study utilizes a 7-point scale closed-ended survey questionnaire items ( Boadu et al, 2021b ; Xie et al, 2022a ). We designed our scales in English, translated them to Chinese, and back to English to ensure their reliability ( Brislin, 1970 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to RBV [22], innovation capability, as a key resource of firms, is particularly critical in the pursuit of innovation goals [74,75] and is a key driver of business growth, performance, and a sustained competitive edge [76]. The NBRV further argues that a firm's competitive edge fundamentally lies in its relationship with the natural environment [29], so sustainable development represents a new goal that firms will inevitably pursue, and it has indeed been proved that innovation is a major driver of sustainable development [77]; Boadu, Xie, Du, and Dwomo-Fokuo [78] contend that innovation plays an influential role in the firm's development and sustainability, especially in an exhaustively aggressive business environment. Moreover, activities that drive sustainable development are increasingly analyzed as a source of competitive edge for firms [79].…”
Section: Corporate Innovation Capability and Sustainable Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, all the empirical findings exhibited by this research stem from quantitative data, which was employed to examine the research phenomenon; it could be necessary for future researchers to engage the qualitative method to shed more light on the association among the variables. Second, the current research only considers the association among the constructs under the control roles of subsidiary age, size, R&D intensity, and industry type to account for dissimilarities in innovation outcome without considering their moderating influences or the other moderating roles of strategic variables such as ownership type of subsidiaries, collaborative know-how, prior experience, learning capacity, and organizational supports (Boadu et al, 2021b;Shi et al, 2021). In future studies, we believe that researchers can scrutinize the correlation between the constructs under the moderating mechanisms of these factors to offer an unfathomable comprehension of the association among them.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%