2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2011.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammographic image segmentation and risk classification based on mammographic parenchymal patterns and geometric moments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] (79.3%), Chen et al [7,9] (59%, 70%, 72%, 75% and 76%), Bovis and Singh [3] (71.4%), and He et al [11] (70%). However, the methods of Parthaláin et al [6] and Oliver et al [2] achieved 91.4% and 86%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[5] (79.3%), Chen et al [7,9] (59%, 70%, 72%, 75% and 76%), Bovis and Singh [3] (71.4%), and He et al [11] (70%). However, the methods of Parthaláin et al [6] and Oliver et al [2] achieved 91.4% and 86%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 summarises the feature extraction process in this study. Note that, in comparison to the other methods [2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] our proposed method applied the LTP operators only within the F GD roi and features were extracted at eight different orientations. Fig.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations