2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-012-9200-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammary gland stem cells: More puzzles than explanations

Abstract: Mammary gland stem cells (MaSC) have not been identified in spite of extensive research spanning over several decades. This has been primarily due to the complexity of mammary gland structure and its development, cell heterogeneity in the mammary gland and the insufficient knowledge about MaSC markers. At present, Lin (-) CD29 (i) CD49f (i) CD24 (+/mod) Sca- 1 (-) cells of the mammary gland have been reported to be enriched with MaSCs. We suggest that the inclusion of stem cell markers like Oct4, Sox2, Nanog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, NANOG is a particularly challenging therapeutic target given its role as a master transcription factor important in several cellular functions in CSC and non-cancer stem cells, including adipose-derived and mammary gland stem cells (Dentelli, et al 2012; Kaimala, et al 2012). Our novel findings of the inhibitory effects of LEPR silencing on NANOG expression, CSC self-renewal, cell proliferation, and tumor outgrowth in murine and human breast cancer cell lines suggest LEPR or components of its downstream signaling pathway may be promising as a druggable targets to inhibit the pro-cancer effects associated with NANOG .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NANOG is a particularly challenging therapeutic target given its role as a master transcription factor important in several cellular functions in CSC and non-cancer stem cells, including adipose-derived and mammary gland stem cells (Dentelli, et al 2012; Kaimala, et al 2012). Our novel findings of the inhibitory effects of LEPR silencing on NANOG expression, CSC self-renewal, cell proliferation, and tumor outgrowth in murine and human breast cancer cell lines suggest LEPR or components of its downstream signaling pathway may be promising as a druggable targets to inhibit the pro-cancer effects associated with NANOG .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a general consensus about some of the factors that mark and or regulate the MaSC population, the field has been left with more questions than answers when trying to specifically define MaSCs [74]. For example, the estimates for stem cell frequency, derived from calculating the number of mammary repopulating units, varies dramatically.…”
Section: The Mammary Stem Cell Conundrum: More Questions Than Ansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, researchers have reported MaSCs as bi-potent [14] and lineage-restricted unipotent stem cells [6]. Indeed, the precise identification and subsequent characterization of MaSCs are conflicting [15] and need to be re-evaluated in the context of their dynamics [16]. Identifying different MaSC subtypes will allow precise targets to be found for optimal manipulation of increased milk production.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%