2016
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammalian development does not recapitulate suspected key transformations in the evolutionary detachment of the mammalian middle ear

Abstract: The ectotympanic, malleus and incus of the developing mammalian middle ear (ME) are initially attached to the dentary via Meckel's cartilage, betraying their origins from the primary jaw joint of land vertebrates. This recapitulation has prompted mostly unquantified suggestions that several suspected-but similarly unquantified-key evolutionary transformations leading to the mammalian ME are recapitulated in development, through negative allometry and posterior/medial displacement of ME bones relative to the ja… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also the oldest and best-documented example of developmental recapitulation of an evolutionary transformation [2–5], as the final separation of the middle ear from the dentary through disappearance of Meckel’s cartilage occurs in mammalian development as in evolution [6, 7] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also the oldest and best-documented example of developmental recapitulation of an evolutionary transformation [2–5], as the final separation of the middle ear from the dentary through disappearance of Meckel’s cartilage occurs in mammalian development as in evolution [6, 7] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex bone reorganization of the mandible occurred during detachment of the mammalian middle ear, which is well supported by fossil evidence (e.g., Allin & Hopson, 1992;Kermack, Mussett, & Rigney, 1981;Luo, Schultz, & Ekdale, 2016;Manley & Sienknecht, 2013;Martin & Luo, 2005;Meng, Bi, Zheng, & Wang, 2016;Meng, Wang, & Li, 2011). Clearing and staining techniques using ontogenetic sequences drew an even clearer picture of the evolution of the mammalian middle ear in more recent years (Anthwal et al, 2013;Ramírez-Chaves et al, 2016a;Ramírez-Chaves, Weisbecker, Wroe, & Phillips, 2016b;Rich, Hopson, Musser, Flannery, & Vickers-Rick, 2005;Urban et al, 2017).…”
Section: Middle Earmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…A limiting factor to our understanding of the evolution of postcranial adaptations for flight in bats (e.g., forelimb bone elongation, reduced cortical thickness, interdigital membranes) is the patchiness of the fossil record, which lacks postcranial transitional forms between the nonvolant bat ancestor and the oldest bat fossils known, and between modern bats with novel locomotory strategies and their most recent common ancestors (Eiting & Gunnell, ; Hand et al, , ). Further understanding of the developmental basis of flight adaptations in bats could inform understanding about the correspondence between the adaptations to selective pressures that taxa experience and fluctuations in their developmental trajectories (Geiger, Forasiepi, Koyabu & Sanchez‐Villagra ; Koyabu et al, ; Ramírez‐Chaves et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%