Malpractice Payouts and Malpractice Insurance: Evidence from Texas Closed Claims, 1990–2003

Abstract

Using medical malpractice claims with payments of $25,000 or more that closed in Texas from 1990 to 2003, this study quantifies physicians' insurance limits and examines the connection between policy size and payments on claims. It finds that most physicians had less than $1 million (nominal) in coverage, that real policy size declined, that settlements at the policy limits were common, that payment size was stable or falling, and that payments above the policy limits were rare. It also finds that physicians rarely made out-of-pocket payments, suggesting the policy limits often cap recoveries, and that the frequency of out-of-pocket payments declined as policy size increased. Results are presented separately for ''perinatal physicians.''

Insurance Crisis or Liability Crisis? Medical Malpractice Claiming in Illinois, 1980–2010

“…But, many of the factors that drive liability costs—the rate and severity of patient injuries; medical costs; wages; access to legal services and courts; and jurors’ attitudes—should change slowly over time. And, the med mal liability system rarely pays victims more than insurance policy limits, regardless of the level of damages a jury might award (Zeiler et al ; Silver et al ). The de facto cap on recovery set by policy limits is an additional reason why rapid changes in liability costs should be unusual…”

The Effect of Tort Reform on Medical Malpractice Insurance Market Trends

“… A related area of literature considers other topics pertaining to the operations of medical malpractice insurers. For example, Black et al () examine the relation between insurer reserves and defense costs, Silver et al () examine the relation between medical malpractice claims payments and the size of the insurance policy, and Karl and Nyce () examine the determinants of entry into the medical malpractice insurance market.…”