1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(70)80001-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant melanoma of the skin of the head and neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
101
1
6

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
101
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this are uncertain but baldness and shorter hair styles in men are likely to be the explanation. Most studies of head and neck melanoma have reported a male predominance (Kragh and 943 Erich, 1960;Conley and Pack, 1963;Catlin, 1966;Ballantyne, 1970;Fitzpatrick et al, 1972;Knutson et al, 1972;Donellan et al, 1972;Simons, 1972;Ames et al, 1976;Gussack et al, 1983;Urist et al, 1984;Fisher, 1989;O'Brien et al, 1991), although a few studies (McGovern et al, 1980;Wanebo et al, 1988;Ringborg et al, 1993;Andersson et al, 1993) support our finding an excess of females. Where data for other body sites is available from the same study population, the male-female ratio is higher for the head and neck than for other body sites (Hansen and McCarten, 1974;Ames et al, 1976;Gussack et al, 1983;Cox et al, 1987;Langford et al, 1993) and an absolute or relative excess of females with LMM is generally reported in studies where this has been analysed (McGovern et al, 1980;Cox et al, 1987;Ringborg et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reasons for this are uncertain but baldness and shorter hair styles in men are likely to be the explanation. Most studies of head and neck melanoma have reported a male predominance (Kragh and 943 Erich, 1960;Conley and Pack, 1963;Catlin, 1966;Ballantyne, 1970;Fitzpatrick et al, 1972;Knutson et al, 1972;Donellan et al, 1972;Simons, 1972;Ames et al, 1976;Gussack et al, 1983;Urist et al, 1984;Fisher, 1989;O'Brien et al, 1991), although a few studies (McGovern et al, 1980;Wanebo et al, 1988;Ringborg et al, 1993;Andersson et al, 1993) support our finding an excess of females. Where data for other body sites is available from the same study population, the male-female ratio is higher for the head and neck than for other body sites (Hansen and McCarten, 1974;Ames et al, 1976;Gussack et al, 1983;Cox et al, 1987;Langford et al, 1993) and an absolute or relative excess of females with LMM is generally reported in studies where this has been analysed (McGovern et al, 1980;Cox et al, 1987;Ringborg et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Ulceration is a significant predictive factor in many studies that have controlled for tumour thickness (Balch et al, 1978(Balch et al, , 1980Van der Esch, 1981;Day et al, 1982b;Urist et al, 1984;Shaw et al, 1985;O'Brien et al, 1991;Andersson et al, 1993;Langford et al, 1993;MacKie et al, 1995) and even retains significance in patients with lymph node metastasis (Balch et al, 1980). Male sex has been associated with poorer prognosis in most studies of head and neck melanoma (Ballantyne, 1970;Fitzpatrick et al, 1972;Hansen and McCarten, 1974;Gussack et al, 1983;Cox et al, 1987;O'Brien et al, 1991;Langford et al, 1993;Ringborg et al, 1993;Andersson et al, 1993), although some studies report no sex difference (Catlin, 1966;Knutson et al, 1972;McGovern et al, 1980) and one reported a better prognosis in men (Southwick et al, 1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different staging systems for MM have been proposed and used. This challenges comparative studies of treatment and prognosis [6][7][8]. MMHN was reclassified in 2009 in the Seventh Edition of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) Classification of Malignant Tumors [9], in order to improve tumor staging and prognostics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%