2003
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male rock sparrows adjust their breeding strategy according to female ornamentation: parental or mating investment?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
70
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
3
70
2
Order By: Relevance
“…D-G, An apparent association between paternal care and EPP can result from two independent associations between (1) female individual quality and extrapair paternity (D) or paternal care (E) or between (2) environmental effects and EPP (F) or paternal care (G). don 2000; Pilastro et al 2003;Matessi et al 2009;Morales et al 2009). If females differ consistently in the number of EPO in their broods, and the quantity of EPO is associated with individual quality (Forstmeier et al 2011), then a misleading association with paternal care can result ( fig.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D-G, An apparent association between paternal care and EPP can result from two independent associations between (1) female individual quality and extrapair paternity (D) or paternal care (E) or between (2) environmental effects and EPP (F) or paternal care (G). don 2000; Pilastro et al 2003;Matessi et al 2009;Morales et al 2009). If females differ consistently in the number of EPO in their broods, and the quantity of EPO is associated with individual quality (Forstmeier et al 2011), then a misleading association with paternal care can result ( fig.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in response to reduced plumage spottiness in female barn owls (Tyto alba) and reduced UV crown reflectance in female blue tits, males provisioned nestlings less than males paired to control females (Roulin, 1999;Mahr et al, 2012). While provisioning rate of male rock sparrows was not influenced by the reduced breast patch size of females, males did reduce their level of nest defence when paired to females displaying the less attractive phenotype compared to control females (Pilastro et al, 2003;Matessi et al, 2009). That male tree swallows did not provision in relation to female attractiveness suggests that plumage brightness is not a signal assessed by males, at least when making decisions on how much to invest in parental care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies testing male differential allocation have generally demonstrated that males adjust investment in parental care according to mate attractiveness as predicted by positive differential allocation (e.g., Burley, 1988;Roulin, 1999;Pilastro et al, 2003;Matessi et al, 2009;Mahr et al, 2012, but see Limbourg et al, 2013). For example, in response to reduced plumage spottiness in female barn owls (Tyto alba) and reduced UV crown reflectance in female blue tits, males provisioned nestlings less than males paired to control females (Roulin, 1999;Mahr et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations