2006
DOI: 10.1080/01443610600955602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male contraception: Past, present and future

Abstract: Male contraception research has yielded a number of promising leads over the past 50 years. Yet, little is known by the public due to lack of institutional support and funding. This is unfortunate since, apart from condom and vasectomy, there are many male methods which may be safer, more effective and easier to use. This paper explores male contraception which has been used in the past and the present and discusses some of its potential developments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] The purpose of this review was to summarize the published data regarding hormone-based male contraceptive treatment options.…”
Section: Hormonal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] The purpose of this review was to summarize the published data regarding hormone-based male contraceptive treatment options.…”
Section: Hormonal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although efforts to develop effective plant-derived male contraceptive agents have been undertaken, the progress in this area has been minimal. For instance, daily use of Tripterygium wilfordii extract elicited antifertility properties in animals and men by distorting sperm development and lowering sperm count but its use was associated with adverse side effects (Qian 1987;Herdiman et al 2006;D'Cruz et al 2010;Jing et al 2017). Furthermore, gossypol obtained from cotton seed oil provoked antifertility effects in human and animal models through reduction in sperm quality and increase in sperm mortality, degeneration of the testis and disruption of spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis (Coutinho 2002;Santana et al 2015;Lim et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%