2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications

Abstract: Consumers in industrialized countries are nowadays much more interested in information about the production methods and components of the food products that they eat, than they had been 50years ago. Some production methods are perceived as less "natural" (i.e. conventional agriculture) while some food components are seen as "unhealthy" and "unfamiliar" (i.e. artificial additives). This phenomenon, often referred to as the "clean label" trend, has driven the food industry to communicate whether a certain ingred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
438
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 714 publications
(523 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
6
438
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceptance tends to be greater when consumers understand what they are consuming, probably because consumers feel more confident (Deliza, Rosenthal, & Silva, ). A similar higher acceptance in informed tests was observed for sugar reduced orange/pomegranate juice (Reis et al, ), protected designation of origin products (Kos Skubic, Erjavec, Ule, & Klopčič, ) and organic food (Asioli et al, ), food processing information including some benefits for consumers (Deliza et al, ; Lee et al, ), which can be considered highly positive information. On the other hand, the same scores were observed in blind/informed sensory tests when the received information did not have a strong appeal (e.g., type of meat used to prepare sausages and coppa [Meier‐Dinkel et al, ; de Andrade, Nalério, Giongo, et al, ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The acceptance tends to be greater when consumers understand what they are consuming, probably because consumers feel more confident (Deliza, Rosenthal, & Silva, ). A similar higher acceptance in informed tests was observed for sugar reduced orange/pomegranate juice (Reis et al, ), protected designation of origin products (Kos Skubic, Erjavec, Ule, & Klopčič, ) and organic food (Asioli et al, ), food processing information including some benefits for consumers (Deliza et al, ; Lee et al, ), which can be considered highly positive information. On the other hand, the same scores were observed in blind/informed sensory tests when the received information did not have a strong appeal (e.g., type of meat used to prepare sausages and coppa [Meier‐Dinkel et al, ; de Andrade, Nalério, Giongo, et al, ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…So far, a jointly agreed upon definition or specific regulations/legislations does not exist, leaving the interpretation as rather subjective for consumers and food practitioners. A clear definition of clean label that can improve understanding of consumer perception and behavior, guide manufacturers in food development and communication, and support policymakers' efforts in providing a targeted regulatory framework is needed [8].…”
Section: Clean Labelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, consumers expect particularly high food quality, including safety, sensory attractiveness and proper nutritional value of food, although such features as confirmed health‐promoting properties and ease of use are also highly desired (Asioli et al . ; Linares et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%