2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of shape: An analysis of children's written responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
3
12
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A more detailed study is required to put forth why they go out of formal definitions. In addition, the results obtained in this study putting forth that the teachers find it more effective to have the students make the definition instead of the teacher expressing the definition directly is in accordance with literature data (De Villiers, 1998;Walcott et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A more detailed study is required to put forth why they go out of formal definitions. In addition, the results obtained in this study putting forth that the teachers find it more effective to have the students make the definition instead of the teacher expressing the definition directly is in accordance with literature data (De Villiers, 1998;Walcott et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Esta complementariedad vinculada a los diferentes atributos que podemos considerar en las figuras, apoyan la existencia de un nivel "sincrético" entre lo perceptual y lo analítico en una clasificación por niveles más generales Fujita, 2012;Hershkowitz et al, 1990;Yesil-Dagli y Halat, 2016). Nuestros resultados indican que conforme avanzan los cursos, mayor es la capacidad para analizar las figuras geométricas y menor la influencian de la perspectiva perceptual (aprehensión perceptual); sin embargo, esta progresión no es uniforme para los diferentes atributos de una figura (Walcott, Mohr y Kastberg, 2009). …”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…One of the reasons for having students operate with prototypical figures is their static understanding in the typical position: considering quadrilaterals to be static figures with certain properties (e.g., a trapezium is a figure with one pair of parallel sides, one of which is parallel to the bottom edge of the paper). This has been considered to be the main reason for students not being able to conceptualize the interrelationships among different quadrilaterals (Walcott et al 2009). …”
Section: Understanding Of Two-dimensional (2-d) Figures By Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%