2019
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2019.1602392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Sense of Persistence in Scientific Purgatory: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Instructors in Introductory Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the common practice, particularly in STEM fields, of removing personal responsibility on the part of the instructor while blaming other factors negatively affecting student academic performance, (e.g. poor high school preparation) (Ferrare & Miller, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is in contrast to the common practice, particularly in STEM fields, of removing personal responsibility on the part of the instructor while blaming other factors negatively affecting student academic performance, (e.g. poor high school preparation) (Ferrare & Miller, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The emergence of the trustworthiness of stakeholders can only be achieved by honest banks by developing good systems so that banks can operate, develop and write up-to-date history. The nature of stakeholder trust allows banks to use them to mobilize deposits, attract investment, provide and distribute funds to those in need, (Ferrare & Miller, 2020).…”
Section: Maqashid Syariah Index (Msi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ample research has confirmed that early biology coursework has served as a gatekeeper to science attainment (Gasiewski et al, 2012), that persistence challenges have limited the number and diversity of new members of the science workforce (Allen‐Ramdial & Campbell, 2014), and that retention and achievement rates in science courses have been the poorest in the first 2 years of undergraduate study (Heatherly et al, 2017; Olson & Riordan, 2012). Ample effort has been focused on addressing the institutional factors (Estrada et al, 2016) and instructor awareness and practices (Ferrare & Miller, 2020) that could affect achievement in early Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) courses. Little attention has been paid to the learning materials themselves, however.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%