Making sense of nonsense: Fabrication, ambiguity, error and clarification in the organization of experience in ordinary conversation

Dornelles, Clara; Garcez, Pedro M.

doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00077-1

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Frame theory then refers to these expectations about the world, based on prior experience, against which new experiences are measured and interpreted. According to Dornelles and Garcez (2001: 1708), the notion of frame is to do with ‘an interactant's sense of what is going on here and now’ and is a question that participants are constantly entertaining while interacting. ‘Participants to talk‐in‐interaction seem to design their actions according to their view of what roles they are playing within it’ (Dornelles and Garcez 2001: 1708).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Voices of disability on the radio

O’Malley

2008

Intl J Lang & Comm Disor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frame analysis reveals how disability (including communication disability) is dealt with in the talk of a radio programme for and about people with disability. There is an overemphasis on medical aspects of disability and a view of disability as a primarily physical phenomenon is broadcast. In spite of mainly medical/factual questions, interviewees manage to include rich accounts of their experience. People with communication disability are not included, possibly due to issues of intelligibility or lack of awareness. Speech and language therapists have a valuable role to play in terms of 'learning to listen' and 'helping to tell'.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Voices of disability on the radio

O’Malley

2008

Intl J Lang & Comm Disor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yukarıda belirtilen türlerdeki onarım mekanizmaları, İngilizcenin Schegloff, Jefferson ve Sacks (1977) yanı sıra İspanyolca (Mason, 2004), Çince (Günthner, 1998;Wei, 1998), Portekizce (Dornelles ve Garcez, 2001), Almanca (Rieger, 2003) ve Endonezce (Wouk, 2005) gibi birçok farklı dilde incelenmiştir.…”

Section: Onarım Organizasyonuunclassified

İnsanlararası ilişkilerde anlam inşası: Türkçede onarım türleri

Tekdemir-Yurtdaş¹

2018

kalem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖzSchegloff, Jefferson ve Sacks (1977) karşılıklı konuşma sırasında ortaya çıkan etkileşimsel sorunlar ve bu sorunlara ilişkin yapılan sözel eylemlere onarım (repair) pratikleri adını vermiştir. Karşılıklı konuşmalarda gözlenen onarım süreci, karşılıklı konuşma sırasında ifade etmede, duymada ve anlamada yaşanan sorunları çözmek üzere gerçekleştirilen sözel eylemlerdir. Onarım süreçleri, konuşma analizi adı verilen yaklaşım çerçevesinde kuramsallaştırılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, günlük hayattan seçilmiş dört ortamda (aile, arkadaş, iş ve sokak) tespit edilen onarım türleri-nin, konuşmanın gerçekleştiği ortama göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını konuşma analizi yaklaşımı ile incelemektir. Çalışmanın verilerini bu dört ortamda kaydedilmiş olan 8 saatlik (her bir ortamda 2 saat olmak üzere) konuşma kayıtları oluşturmuştur. Analiz sonuçları, kullanılan onarım pratiklerinin ortamlar arasında belirgin bir farklılık göstermediğini ortaya koymuştur. Bütün ortamlarda, verilerin hiçbirinde göz-lenmeyen ötekinin başlattığı ötekinin tamamladığı onarım türü dışında, hem kendini onarım hem de ötekinin onarımı tespit edilmiştir; ancak kendini onarım kullanımının bütün ortamlarda daha fazla tercih edildiği gözlenmiştir. Kendini onarımın, ötekinin onarımına kıyasla daha fazla tercih edilmiş olması, başka diller bağlamında onarım üzerine yapılan çalışmaların sonuçları ile benzerlik taşımaktadır.

show abstract

“…6 By comparing and contrasting them with natural (i.e., non-created) languages, we will provide evidence for treating these languages as meaningful, and thus that we must give an account of how they are meaningful.…”

Section: Meaningful Fictional Languagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7 No one single person has the authority to say what is meaningful and correct and what is not, and yet these questions can still be answered, unlike the case of Tolkien's languages. 6 In terms of content and the arguments we'll make, we could in much of what follows also discuss constructed non-fictional languages, such as Esperanto. However, in order to keep the focus narrow, we do not do so in the present paper.…”

Section: Meaningful Fictional Languagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such theories account for how our brain tends to process language-related inputs, and can be paired with a theory of pragmatics explaining how we expect a linguistic experience of conversation to proceed. In [6], Dornelles and Garcez attempt to explain the phenomenon of understanding nonsense with a scenario of a telephone conversation within a fabricated frame. The telephone conversation involved three participants, A, B and C. A called B thinking he was ordering beer from a beverage company for a party and they engaged in a short conversation.…”

Section: Understanding Nonsensementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Against Truth-Conditional Theories of Meaning: Three Lessons from the Language(s) of Fiction

Uckelman¹,

Chan²

2016

Res Phil.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. AbstractFictional discourse and fictional languages provide useful test cases for theories of meaning. In this paper, we argue against truth-conditional accounts of meaning on the basis of problems posed by language(s) of fiction. It is well-known how fictional discourse -discourse about non-existent objects -poses a problem for truth-conditional theories of meaning. Less well-considered, however, are the problems posed by fictional languages, which can be created to either be meaningful or not to be meaningful; both of these ultimately also provide problems for a truth-conditional account of meaning, because it cannot account for the ways in which we use and evaluate such fictional languages. Instead, a pragmatic or use-based account provides a better explanation for some of the phenomena we dicsuss.

show abstract

Making sense of nonsense: Fabrication, ambiguity, error and clarification in the organization of experience in ordinary conversation

Cited by 7 publications

References 10 publications

Voices of disability on the radio

Voices of disability on the radio

İnsanlararası ilişkilerde anlam inşası: Türkçede onarım türleri

Against Truth-Conditional Theories of Meaning: Three Lessons from the Language(s) of Fiction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About