1992
DOI: 10.1080/15295039209366832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of common sense: A framework for tracking hegemony

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hegemony is not total; it is challenged by alternative or oppositional forces (Condit, 1994;Lewis, 1992;Williams, 2001). Mass media provide "contested terrain" for hegemony (Condit, 1994;Hargreaves, 1994;Kellner, 1990).…”
Section: Media Sport and Hegemonymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hegemony is not total; it is challenged by alternative or oppositional forces (Condit, 1994;Lewis, 1992;Williams, 2001). Mass media provide "contested terrain" for hegemony (Condit, 1994;Hargreaves, 1994;Kellner, 1990).…”
Section: Media Sport and Hegemonymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Though it holds the potential to introduce other religions, it still conveys the implicit acceptance of the familiar, through repeated Catholic images and references, and perpetuates the dominant view of that tradition. From this vantage point, the series becomes part of the media-created and perpetuated "terrain of ideology" (Lewis, 1992) that discounts outside religions, such as those depicted in single episodes. The tacit approval of content, indicated by viewership, thus contributes to a hegemonic notion regarding the legitimacy and credibility of some religions over others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than a purposive, deliberate process by those in power (government, institutions, and media), Condit interpreted hegemony as a result of the most heard RELIGION IN REALITY TV voices or viewpoints within pluralism, "the hegemonic perspective assumes that there must be something universal (or at least general) in any successful claim in order for a wide variety of groups to identify with it" (p. 219). Thus, hegemony finds its strength not in the state in and of itself, but in basically all facets of society, and in individuals, as Lewis (1992) explained, "the 'common sense' of the social order (as various ideological formations) may originate in the collective; but, if persistent, it is soon internalized in the 'taken for grantedness' of the individual's natural attitude" (p. 283). Thus, hegemony finds its strength not in the state in and of itself, but in basically all facets of society, and in individuals, as Lewis (1992) explained, "the 'common sense' of the social order (as various ideological formations) may originate in the collective; but, if persistent, it is soon internalized in the 'taken for grantedness' of the individual's natural attitude" (p. 283).…”
Section: Hegemony and The Mass Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%