1994
DOI: 10.2307/1386602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Secular and Religious Attributions: The Availability Hypothesis Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis resembles the attention theory of attribution, in that it suggests that the salience of thoughts of God should inXuence attributions of agency. Although the hypothesis has been evaluated in some studies, research has not revealed consistent eVects of availability-Wnding instead a general bias toward attributions to God for positive as opposed to negative events (Lupfer, De Paola, Brock, & Clement, 1994). We contend that attributions to God do not follow directly from mere attention or salience, but from more the complex processes of authorship processing.…”
Section: Self Versus Other Agentsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This hypothesis resembles the attention theory of attribution, in that it suggests that the salience of thoughts of God should inXuence attributions of agency. Although the hypothesis has been evaluated in some studies, research has not revealed consistent eVects of availability-Wnding instead a general bias toward attributions to God for positive as opposed to negative events (Lupfer, De Paola, Brock, & Clement, 1994). We contend that attributions to God do not follow directly from mere attention or salience, but from more the complex processes of authorship processing.…”
Section: Self Versus Other Agentsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…There is currently a paucity of research in the psychology of religion related to the impact of cognitions regarding demons upon overall psychological health. Researchers know only that attributions to Satan as a causal agent for any event are very rare (Lupfer, Brock, & Depaola, 1992;Lupfer, Depaola, Brock, & Clement, 1994;Lupfer, Tolliver, & Jackson, 1996;Weeks & Lupfer, 2000). It is striking, then, that these attributions comprise the largest set of explanations for depression in our media sample.…”
Section: Demonic Influences In the Etiology Of Depressionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This less favorable view of demons may be supported by research. On those infrequent occasions in which individuals do cite Satan as a causal agent in human events, the events described included human behaviors of which research participants disapproved (Lupfer et al, 1994). In rare instances, Satan was also blamed for negative outcomes of events (Lupfer et al, 1992).…”
Section: Demonic Influences In the Etiology Of Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typological questionnaire: In this study I employed the vignette method (Rossi & Nock 1982), a technique used to investigate attitudes in social settings in an attempt to understand the complexity of the human situation investigated in its context and locate it in relation to the main research variables. The vignette method has been used in social behavioural research (Byers & Zeller 1995;Gowers et al 1996) and also to investigate certain religious aspects (Brodie & Fowler 1985;Lupfer et al 1994). …”
Section: Measures and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%