Making Resilient Decisions for Sustainable Circularity of Fashion

Abstract

The fashion and textiles industry, and policymakers at all levels, are showing an increased interest in the concept of circular economy as a way to decrease business risks and negative environmental impacts. However, focus is placed mainly on the material ‘stuff’ of textile fashion and its biophysical harms. The current material focus has several shortcomings, because fashion is a social-ecological system and cannot be understood merely by addressing its environmental dimensions. In this paper, we rethink the fashion system from a critical social-ecological perspective. The driver-state-response framework shows social drivers and ecological impacts as an adaptive social-ecological system, exposing how these interacting aspects need to be addressed for sustainable and resilient implementation of circular economy. We show how current responses to global sustainability challenges have so far fallen short. Our overall aim is to expand possibilities for reframing responses that better reflect the complex links between the global fashion system, culture and creativity and the dynamics of the living planet. We argue that reducing planetary pressure from the global fashion and textiles industry requires greater recognition of the system’s social drivers with more emphasis on the many cross-scale links between social and ecological dimensions. Resilient decisions aiming for sustainable circularity of the fashion industry must therefore pay attention to social activities beyond the industry value chain, not just material flows within it.

Implementing circular business models in the textile and clothing industry

“…Boström and Micheletti, 2016;EEA, 2019). While organisations have made serious attempts to achieve sustainability (Keßler et al, 2021;Palm et al, 2021), the industry is far from being a circular economy (CE) -a concept centred on the preservation of natural resources, maximisation of resource outputs, and elimination of negative system externalities, such as emissions and the accumulation of waste (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017). The adoption of CE principles offers T&C manufacturers significant business opportunities in areas ranging from sustainability and brand image to profitability and shareholder value (Saha et al, 2021).…”

Beyond growth: a wellbeing economy for the textile and garment sector

“…The sector has grown rapidly, doubling in size over the past 15 years, making it one of the world's largest and most globalised supply chains. 10 An estimated 100 billion garments are produced annually, most ending up as waste, with only 1% recycled into new clothing. In Australia, an estimated 5.3 billion units of clothing are in use, less than 2% of which are made of recycled clothing fibres.…”

Grounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectives

“…Some seeds and CoLab proposals mentioned creating and expanding markets such as an ethical fashion industry, and many others looked at innovations related to new and growing markets within the circular and sharing economies. Although there are strong arguments that a focus on a circular economy in the fashion industry risks addressing only material concerns and not taking into account the broader social-ecological system implications (Palm et al 2021). These changes may require market-supporting policies like the labelling of fashion projects that meet certain standards, and subsidies that make niche innovations (e.g.…”