Grounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectives

Abstract

Future scenarios and pathways of potential development trajectories are powerful tools to assist with decision-making to address many sustainability challenges. Such scenarios play a major role in global environmental assessments (GEAs). Currently, however, scenarios in GEAs are mostly developed at the global level by experts and researchers, and locally imagined, bottom-up scenarios do not play a role in such assessments. In this paper, we argue that addressing future sustainability challenges for achieving more equitable development in GEAs requires a more explicit role for bottom-up inspired futures. To this end, this paper employs an innovative global assessment framework for exploring alternative futures that are grounded in local realities and existing practical actions, and that can be appropriately scaled to the required decision-making level. This framework was applied in the context of the UN’s Global Environment Outlook 6, a major example of a GEA. We developed novel methods for synthesizing insights from a wide range of local practices and perspectives into global futures. We collected information from crowdsourcing platforms, outcomes of participatory workshops in different regions of the world, and an assessment of reported regional outlooks. We analysed these according to a framework also used by an integrated assessment model in the same GEA. We conclude that bottom-up approaches to identify and assess transformative solutions that envision future pathways towards greater sustainability significantly strengthen current GEA scenario-development approaches. They provide decision makers with required actionable information based on tangible synergistic solutions that have been tested on the ground. This work has revealed that there are significant opportunities for the integration of bottom-up knowledge and insights into GEAs, to make such assessments more salient and valuable to decision makers.

A learning journey into contemporary bioregionalism

“…In response, place-specific approaches to sustainability are prominent in the emerging 'relational turn' in sustainability science (Hakkarainen et al, 2022;Stålhammar & Thorén, 2019;West et al, 2020) and the pursuit of a relational paradigm is unearthing a variety of new approaches in sustainability that respond to global issues through specific places and deliver sociocultural change as well as direct environmental outcomes (Chan et al, 2016;Masterson et al, 2019;Norström et al, 2022;Pereira et al, 2020Pereira et al, , 2021Wyborn et al, 2020).…”

“…In doing so, efforts to approach sustainability through deliberative and bottom‐up approaches have gone from compelling calls (MacGillivray, 2015; Stirling, 2015) to concrete action, with influential global programmes in research (Norström et al., 2022) and in policy (Pereira et al., 2021) deliberately adopting a contextual focus due to the ethical and qualitative nuance that it brings. These broad shifts can be partially understood by positioning them in what West et al.…”

Participatory Project Planning and Performance of Donor Funded Projects in Khulna, Bangladesh

“…There has to be more research done on this subject, but this time with other factors. Pereira, Asrar, Bhargava, Fisher, Hsu, Jabbour and Weinfurter (2021) conducted research to raise consciousness about the need of rethinking current wheat policy and practice in favour of more collaborative, bottom-up approaches to planning. This study draws on empirical scientific study conducted in Ukraine for a doctoral thesis, specifically examining the impact of participatory…”

One Health: The Psychology of Human-Nature Relationships for Planetary and Human Wellbeing - Volume II

“…Policies and practices that nurture our environment while being mindful of societal needs should promote care, protection, and sustainability for both the planet and people from all backgrounds (Kelly, 2018). This requires us to review how we produce science, including our scientific principles, aims, and methods and the way in which we balance the implementation of top-down and bottom-up approaches (Pereira et al, 2019(Pereira et al, , 2021. Additionally, the way we spread and disseminate the usable knowledge has to be adjusted through networks to align science to social needs (Phelps et al, 2012).…”