Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org registry

Pampel, Heinz; Vierkant, Paul; Scholze, Frank; Bertelmann, Roland; Kindling, Maxi; Klump, Jens; Goebelbecker, Hans-Jürgen; Gundlach, Jens; Schirmbacher, Peter; Dierolf, Uwe

doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.21

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…40 It also remains difficult defining what exactly an RDR is. 41 It therefore is difficult to see at this time how researchers could promise RDR management as well as community or lay representation in them. Funders and journal editors should also take account of participants’ preferences regarding location of shared data and who has access to it, and consider making exceptions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review of participants’ attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis

Howe

Giles

Newbury‐Birch

et al. 2018

J Health Serv Res Policy

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Data sharing is well established in biological research, but evidence on sharing of clinical trial or public health research study data remains limited, in particular studies of research participants' perspectives of data sharing. This study systematically reviewed international evidence of research participants' attitudes towards the sharing of data for secondary research use. Methods Systematic search of seven databases, and author-, citation- and bibliography-follow up to identify studies examining research participants' attitudes towards data sharing. Studies were thematically analysed using NVivo v10 to identify recurring themes. Results Nine studies were eligible for inclusion. Thematic analysis identified four key themes: (1) benefits of data sharing, including benefit to participants or immediate community, benefits to the public and benefits to science or research; (2) fears and harms, such as fear of exploitation, stigmatization or repercussions, alongside concerns about confidentiality and misuse of data; (3) data sharing processes, in particular the role of consent in the process; and (4) the relationship between participants and research such as trust in different types of research or organization and the relationship with the original research team. Conclusions The available literature on attitudes towards sharing data from clinical trials or public health interventions remains scant. This study has identified four themes regarding research participants' attitudes and preferences, which should be considered by policy makers, and explored with further research.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review of participants’ attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis

Howe

Giles

Newbury‐Birch

et al. 2018

J Health Serv Res Policy

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are many data repositories available to scientists that ensure longevity and accessibility. Several meta registries contain pointers to data repositories, such as re3data [ Re3data , ; Pampel et al ., ]. Data repositories can be institutional, discipline‐specific, or generic to accommodate “orphan” data [ Vision , ].…”

Section: Suggested Best Practices and Current Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward the Geoscience Paper of the Future: Best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance

Gil

David

Demir

et al. 2016

Earth and Space Science

155

153

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geoscientists now live in a world rich with digital data and methods, and their computational research cannot be fully captured in traditional publications. The Geoscience Paper of the Future (GPF) presents an approach to fully document, share, and cite all their research products including data, software, and computational provenance. This article proposes best practices for GPF authors to make data, software, and methods openly accessible, citable, and well documented. The publication of digital objects empowers scientists to manage their research products as valuable scientific assets in an open and transparent way that enables broader access by other scientists, students, decision makers, and the public. Improving documentation and dissemination of research will accelerate the pace of scientific discovery by improving the ability of others to build upon published work.

show abstract

“…D. Muller, University of Cornell). DB has been recognized as an Open Data research repository by the global Registry of Research Data Repositories organization (Pampel et al, 2012). The EELS DB can thus be included in data management plans, fulfilling an increasingly common requirement found within numerous funding agency grant proposal processes.…”

Section: Open Science and Research Fundingmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Complete Overhaul of the Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy and X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Database: eelsdb.eu

Ewels

Sikora²,

Serin

et al. 2016

Microsc Microanal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) database has been completely rewritten, with an improved design, user interface and a 3 number of new tools. The database is accessible at https://eelsdb.eu/ and can now be used without registration. The submission process has been streamlined to encourage spectrum submissions and the new design gives greater emphasis on contributors' original work by highlighting their papers. With numerous new filters and a powerful search function, it is now simple to explore the database of several hundred of EELS and XAS spectra. Interactive plots allow spectra to be overlaid, facilitating online comparison. An application-programming interface has been created, allowing external tools and software to easily access the information held within the database. In addition to the database itself, users can post and manage job adverts and read the latest news and events regarding the EELS and XAS communities. In accordance with the ongoing drive towards open access data increasingly demanded by funding bodies, the database will facilitate open access data sharing of EELS and XAS spectra.

show abstract

Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org registry

Cited by 14 publications

References 0 publications

Systematic review of participants’ attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis

Systematic review of participants’ attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis

Toward the Geoscience Paper of the Future: Best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance

A Complete Overhaul of the Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy and X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Database: eelsdb.eu

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About