2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015ea000136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward the Geoscience Paper of the Future: Best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance

Abstract: Geoscientists now live in a world rich with digital data and methods, and their computational research cannot be fully captured in traditional publications. The Geoscience Paper of the Future (GPF) presents an approach to fully document, share, and cite all their research products including data, software, and computational provenance. This article proposes best practices for GPF authors to make data, software, and methods openly accessible, citable, and well documented. The publication of digital objects empo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
168
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
(132 reference statements)
1
168
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Barnes 2010;Lees 2012;Easterbrook 2014;David et al 2016;Gil et al, 2016). Nevertheless, an enormous amount of free software exist for geoscientific research or for geotechnical engineering offices.…”
Section: Specific Geoscientific Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barnes 2010;Lees 2012;Easterbrook 2014;David et al 2016;Gil et al, 2016). Nevertheless, an enormous amount of free software exist for geoscientific research or for geotechnical engineering offices.…”
Section: Specific Geoscientific Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the source codes of abandoned applications would not made public, many files would be not easily accessible in future. A fact which is getting important with the increasing demand for open data, data archiving and reproducibility (see e.g., Lees 2012;Davis et al, 2016;Gil et al, 2016). Vendor lock-in is one of the main reasons for keeping the common proprietary software.…”
Section: Openness To Alternative Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by and partnering with early career researchers, I developed the Scientific Paper of the Future (SPF) Initiative to teach scientists how to write papers that describe and cite explicitly not just data but also software and methods (workflows and provenance) [11]. The Initiative includes a special issue of a journal where submissions discuss the scientist's motivation for structuring and reporting their research products more thoroughly.…”
Section: Initiative-driven Thais: Access To the Scientific Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a pragmatic perspective, this is an inefficient use of a scientist's or engineer's time. Perhaps more importantly, it inhibits the ability to reproduce or reuse studies that have a significant computational modeling component Essawy et al, 2016;Gil et al, 2016). One way to begin to address these challenges is through better approaches for sharing and reusing models built by others.…”
Section: Chapter 1: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a pragmatic perspective, it is an inefficient use of scientists' time. Perhaps more importantly, it inhibits scientists' ability to reproduce studies that have a significant computational modeling component Essawy et al, 2016;Gil et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%