Making Pastoralists Count: Geospatial Methods for the Health Surveillance of Nomadic Populations

Abstract

words AbstractNomadic pastoralists are among the world's hardest-to-reach and least-served populations.Pastoralist communities are notoriously difficult to capture in household surveys due to factors including their high degree of mobility, the remote terrain they inhabit, fluid domestic arrangements, and cultural barriers. Most surveys utilize census-based sampling frames which do not accurately capture the demographic and health parameters of nomadic populations. As a result, pastoralists are largely "invisible" in population data such as the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). By combining remote sensing and geospatial analysis, we developed an alternative sampling strategy designed to capture the current distribution of nomadic populations.We then implemented this sampling frame to survey a population of mobile pastoralists in southwest Ethiopia, focusing on maternal and child health (MCH) indicators. Using standardized instruments from DHS questionnaires, we assessed the MCH status of this population in order to draw comparisons with regional and national data. We find substantial disparities between our data collected using a geospatial sampling frame and regional DHS data in core MCH indicators including vaccination coverage, skilled birth attendance, and nutritional status. Census-based measures do not adequately capture population-level characteristics, risking substantial misreporting of the health status of mobile populations. Our study is the first to employ a geospatial survey of a nomadic group at the population level, and our field validation demonstrates that this methodology is a logistically feasible alternative to conventional sampling frames. Geospatial sampling methods open up cost-affordable and logistically feasible strategies for sampling pastoralists and other mobile populations, which is a crucial first step towards reaching these underserved groups with health services. 157

Universal and variable leadership dimensions across human societies

“…These four factors were confounded. Evidence for leadership in residential subgroups and kin groups was relatively more common in hunter-gatherer and pastoralist societies, populations more likely to experience high residential mobility (Kelly, 2013;Rigby, 1985;Wild et al, 2019). Evidence for supracommunity political leadership was more common in horticultural and agricultural societies, which tend to rely heavily on cultivated land and maintain fixed, defensible territories (Figures 2 and S16).…”

Gaps in maternal, newborn, and child health research: a scoping review of 72 years in Ethiopia

“…These populations remain underrepresented in research and household surveys. [22] Along with challenges brought on by nomadic life, there are logistical challenges to conducting research in remote areas with limited infrastructure.…”

Fever and health-seeking behaviour among migrants living along the Thai-Myanmar border: a mixed-methods study

“…Recruitment was based on a convenient sampling method in all the eld sites described above. Establishing a sampling frame in the context of unregistered and mobile population is challenging and cannot rely on any national demographic census 32 : therefore, enrolment was carried out in eld sites where migrants are commonly live and work 10,33,34 .…”