Making gigs work: digital platforms, job quality and worker motivations

Abstract

Technology has driven new organisations of work and employment relationships, rendering changes that would have been unimaginable just a decade ago. The rise of digital platforms has not only enabled new forms of work activity but also transformed the way workers find new opportunities. This development, referred to as gig work, is distinct from traditional employment in that it is mediated through online platforms. While we can somewhat objectively designate traditional job characteristics as ‘good’ or ‘bad’, designating gig work itself as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ overlooks the fact that workers are inclined to evaluate the quality of their jobs according to their own individual needs, priorities, backgrounds and other circumstances—even if those jobs are objectively the same. Unlike previous scholarship on gig work, which has viewed job quality largely from a platform‐focused perspective, this article takes a worker‐centric approach and provides a typology of gig workers. The typology demarcates how gig work is used and indicates key attributes that differentiate how workers approach such jobs. Moreover, the typology reveals heterogeneity in gig workers’ motivations, characteristics and intentions. Consequently, platforms with ‘bad’ job quality characteristics can still offer work that some workers will see as ‘good’ and vice versa.

Crowdwork, digital liminality and the enactment of culturally recognised alternatives to Western precarity: beyond epistemological terra nullius

“…This shows the importance of gaining an in-depth understanding of workers' experiences of a particular type of crowdwork and of not categorising all crowdwork types and on-demand work types -with their different work conditionsunder the vague umbrella terms of "gig economy" or "platform economy". The findings confirm the recent general doubts expressed in research on the gig economy and platform economy that "dominant interpretations [of precarity and technological control] are insufficient" (Schor et al, 2020, p. 833) and also respond to the latest calls for specificity and indepth understanding of gig workers (Dunn, 2020).…”

The Side Hustle Safety Net: Precarious Workers and Gig Work during COVID-19

“…Rather than safely socially distancing at home where they can avoid the health risk of the coronavirus, many workers have turned to gig work providing deliveries and shopping for groceries for white collar peers who are sheltering at home, further highlighting the inequities of the pandemic. After years of gig platform advertising noting that the work is readily available and provides entrepreneurship opportunities (Barratt, Goods, and Veen 2020; Dunn 2020; Ravenelle 2017, 2019; Sutherland et al 2020), we find that workers are turning to gig work and other informal work to make ends meet or as an alternative to unemployment (Rubery et al 2018). We find that precarious workers experience three main barriers in regard to accessing unemployment assistance that can be broadly categorized as knowledge, sociological, and temporal/financial hurdles.…”

Why Parents Misuse Prescription Drugs to Enhance the Cognitive Performance of Healthy Children: The Influence of Peers and Social Media

“…Therefore, such platforms have received cross-disciplinary attention for data collection (Irani, 2015). Motivators for completing tasks are often monetary but differ by task and include fun and education (Al-Ani & Stumpp, 2016; Dunn, 2020; Ipeirotis, 2010). Research with MTurk samples indicates a sufficiently high replication rate of the direction and significance of treatment effects that have been found in probability samples (Mullinix et al, 2015).…”