The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2001
DOI: 10.2175/193864701790860074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Classifying Selectors Work for Foam Control in the Activated Sludge Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the use of selectors has proven sound but due to challenges of removal of a difficult material from the aeration tanks, still classifying selectors have limitation for foam reduction (Parker et al, 2003). …”
Section: Anaerobic Selectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the use of selectors has proven sound but due to challenges of removal of a difficult material from the aeration tanks, still classifying selectors have limitation for foam reduction (Parker et al, 2003). …”
Section: Anaerobic Selectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skimming system should be positioned at proper locations where forward momentum in the reactor and the floating material will flow to the central position (E.g. exit end of aeration basins or location where natural baffling occurs).The effectiveness of the skimming system may be augmented by placing surface baffles to encourage the movement of material at the surface of the liquid toward the foam removal weir(s) (Parker et al, 2003).…”
Section: Skimming Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could decrease the effective SRT of Nocardioform organisms below the system SRT and enhances washout (Parker, et al, 2001).…”
Section: Foam Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although filamentous microorganisms support the activated sludge floc formation, their overabundance in WWTPs causes considerable operational difficulties such as poor sludge settling and thickening (Cydzik-Kwiatkowska and Zielińska, 2016;Pal et al, 2014). Different strategies have been employed to control foaming, including polymer addition, the application of disinfectants such as chlorine, and the use of foam-classifying selectors to skim and remove foaming bacteria (Parker et al, 2003). The use of bacteriophages to reduce the concentration of filamentous bacteria is one of the most promising environmentally friendly approaches to control foaming (Liu et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%