Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability 2002
DOI: 10.1145/957205.957227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making chalk and talk accessible

Abstract: This paper investigates the development of an authoring package designed to mimic traditional "chalk and talk" delivery of content in education. It emphasizes the twin goals of making the output more accessible both for those with disabilities and for distance learners and also making the package usable by academic staff without requiring extensive training. It deals with issues arising from the capture of the material, the compromises and conflicts which are made in the satisfaction of accessibility guideline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has also been noted elsewhere [3]. Informal investigations have suggested this might be because the rate of delivery varied more in a live classroom situation than in the office, resulting in the ends of words being run into the start of subsequent words.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This has also been noted elsewhere [3]. Informal investigations have suggested this might be because the rate of delivery varied more in a live classroom situation than in the office, resulting in the ends of words being run into the start of subsequent words.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It was also observed that lecturers' ASR accuracy rates were lower in classes compared with those achieved in the office environment. This has also been noted elsewhere (Bennett et al, 2002). Informal investigations have suggested this might be because the rate of delivery varied more in a live classroom situation than in the office, resulting in the ends of words being run into the start of subsequent words.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…NaturallySpeaking can achieve impressive accuracy rates by trained speakers in controlled environments [2]. Figure 2 demonstrates the basic architecture of the system.…”
Section: B Modelling the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%