2000
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620190121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major ion toxicity in effluents: A review with permitting recommendations

Abstract: Abstract-Effluent toxicity testing methods have been well defined, but for the most part, these methods do not attempt to segregate the effects of active ionic concentrations and ion imbalances upon test and species performances. The role of various total dissolved solids in effluents on regulatory compliance has emerged during the last few years and has caused confusion in technical assessment and in permitting and compliance issues. This paper assesses the issue of ionic strength and ion imbalance, provides … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total recoverable analytical procedure for metals may be measuring aluminum associated with the suspended clay particles from the ReRAPS liner and therefore could be a biased estimate of the suspended Al hydroxide. The major ion or salinity effect should also be evaluated if complete toxicity removal of acidic runoff is required (Goodfellow 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total recoverable analytical procedure for metals may be measuring aluminum associated with the suspended clay particles from the ReRAPS liner and therefore could be a biased estimate of the suspended Al hydroxide. The major ion or salinity effect should also be evaluated if complete toxicity removal of acidic runoff is required (Goodfellow 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…… This impairs the use of the streams and ultimately leads to listing of these streams as 'impaired water bodies' in EPA's water quality reports …'' (Pomponio 2009). Several recent studies (Chapman et al 2000;Goodfellow et al 2009;Pond et al 2008;Timpano et al 2010) have addressed the issue of TDS as a major stressor upon receiving streams in mined watersheds and are discussed in more detail later in this paper. More recent EPA guidance (issued in 2011; subsequently withdrawn) was based on the belief that mine discharges with EC levels\300 ls/cm generally will not cause significant degradation of the aquatic ecosystem while instream conductivity levels [500 ls/cm are likely to be associated with significant adverse impacts on the aquatic ecosystem.…”
Section: Background On Spoil Weathering and Tds Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of quality parameters is normally standardized and described in various instructions and directives for individual countries or unions like EU [1][2][3][4]. Recently, a very specific attention requires a different type of water quality parameter called "toxicity" ("ecotoxicity") [5][6][7]. It is also important to note that lake waters are important element of the aquatic ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%