2018
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8040049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maize (Zea mays L.) Response to Secondary and Micronutrients for Profitable N, P and K Fertilizer Use in Poorly Responsive Soils

Abstract: Deficiencies of secondary and micronutrients (SMNs) are major causes of low maize yields in poorly responsive soils. This phenomenon minimizes the agronomic efficiency of N, P and K fertilizers and consequently result in a dwindling economic benefit associated with their use. Therefore, 18 on-farm trials were conducted in western Kenya during two cropping seasons to assess maize response to three NPK amendments; (i) N, P, K, Ca, Zn and Cu (inorganic and organic); (ii) N, P, K, Ca, Zn and Cu (inorganic) and (ii… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper has illustrated a simple yet useful method of predicting yield responses to fertilizer over heterogeneous production landscapes, with a view toward guiding strategic investments and policy interventions. In our case study of smallholder Tanzanian maize farmers, our results indicate highly variable fertilizer responses over geographic space, in line with other empirical studies in the region (e.g., [4][5][6][7]). While fertilizer use is profitable, on average, it is not profitable everywhere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper has illustrated a simple yet useful method of predicting yield responses to fertilizer over heterogeneous production landscapes, with a view toward guiding strategic investments and policy interventions. In our case study of smallholder Tanzanian maize farmers, our results indicate highly variable fertilizer responses over geographic space, in line with other empirical studies in the region (e.g., [4][5][6][7]). While fertilizer use is profitable, on average, it is not profitable everywhere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Why are fertilizer usage levels so low? A rich empirical literature has developed in recent years, which emphasizes three key constraints:-agronomic responses to fertilizer are often much lower in farmers' fields than on researcher-managed trials, and such responses are substantially variable over geographic space [4][5][6][7][8]. Low and variable agronomic returns translate into low and variable economic returns once considering the local farm-gate crop and fertilizer prices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farm fields where no satisfactory gains in crop productivity are achieved by standard fertilizer applications have been referred to as ‘non-responsive’ ( Vanlauwe et al, 2010 ), and pose major risks to investments ( Liverpool-Tassie et al, 2017 ), and the environment ( Albanito et al, 2017 ; Russo et al, 2017 ). Few studies have systematically investigated the occurrence of fertilizer non-responsiveness in maize and soybean cropping systems across SSA, and even fewer the biogeochemical factors that cause it ( Kihara et al, 2015 , 2016 ; Ronner et al, 2016 ; Njoroge et al, 2018 ; Shehu et al, 2018 ; Ichami et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no significant interaction effect observed between site and nutrient combinations. The positive effect of combining primary, secondary, and trace nutrients on grain yields has been confirmed in Ghana by Kugbe et al (2019) and in Kenya by Muthaura et al (2017), Njoroge et al (2018), and Otieno (2019). Secondary and micro-nutrients are increasingly becoming important in Kenyan soils.…”
Section: Effect Of the Site And Nutrient Combination On Maize Grain Ymentioning
confidence: 83%