2003
DOI: 10.1111/1475-4754.00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maize and Bone: Residues of Grinding in Northwestern Argentina*

Abstract: Archaeometric and archaeobotanical analyses of grinding residues inside an archaeological milling stone tool from the Cueva de los Corrales 1 site in northwestern Argentina are shown. Multiple analytical techniques are used to identify ground substances, and their results are compared and complemented. They give direct and reliable evidence of maize (Zea mays L.) and burned bone grinding in the pre-hispanic Argentine north-west, although the latter is little related to milling tasks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, by extracting the preserved plant residues on grinding tools, starch grain analysis has been used to identify the types of plant foods processed (e.g. Babot & Apella, 2003;Fullagar et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2014a;Piperno et al, 2000). Microwear analysis provides further insight in the type of materials processed on these tools, and can also be used to infer how the grinding processes were conducted (Dubreuil & Savage, 2014;Van Gijn, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, by extracting the preserved plant residues on grinding tools, starch grain analysis has been used to identify the types of plant foods processed (e.g. Babot & Apella, 2003;Fullagar et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2014a;Piperno et al, 2000). Microwear analysis provides further insight in the type of materials processed on these tools, and can also be used to infer how the grinding processes were conducted (Dubreuil & Savage, 2014;Van Gijn, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, contrary to established perceptions of the past that have associated these tools exclusively with the processing of plants, it is now widely accepted that grinding and pounding stone tools were used for treating a wide range of substances, organic and inorganic (Adams 1999;Del Pilar Babot & Apella 2003;Gould 1968;Kraybill 1977;Schroth 1996;Wright 1994).…”
Section: General Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the materials processed, grinding tools have been traditionally associated with the processing of cereals and other edible plant species. Recent functional studies, including use-wear and residue analyses (e.g., Adams 1988;Albert, Portillo 2005;Bofill et al 2014;Delgado-Raack 2008;Del Pilar Babot, Apella 2003;Dubreuil 2002;2004;Hamon 2008a;Liu et al 2010;Procopiou et al 1998;2002;Veth et al 1997), combined with a variety of ethnographic data (e.g., Arthur 2014;Gould 1968;Horsfall 1987.336;Roux 1985), shed new light into the functional dynamics of these tools. Grinding implements could in fact be actively involved in a wide range of activities, besides cereal grinding, such as the processing of legumes, tubers, roots and bulbs, nuts, fresh and dried fruits, herbs and spices, acorns, meat, bones, wood, tobacco, minerals, clay, pigments, salt, etc.…”
Section: Aspects Of Usementioning
confidence: 99%